IELTS Writing Samples

Response: Nowadays, since a sizeable number of people are immigrating to the big cities in serch of better living condition, the population in the suburbs is dropping. while there are some advantages associated with immigration, I believe the main disadvantages are more substantial. On the one hand, a potential advantage may be better job opportunities. A majority of people who live in the rural areas move to the cities because of earning more money and provide their family with the basic ammenities. For example, big companies in iran are located in cities, thus, people who want to recrute in these companies and having a lucrative career should live in the vicity of the manufactures which are situated in cities. So, the companies' income will be increase because of the skilled workfore who come from the countrysides. Another precieved positive effect is that benefit from a wide vraity of facilities. it is many recreational and residentional facilities in cities, such as better healthcare system or higher standard of education that encourage people to move to cities. Additionally, as a result of moving people to cities, the countrysides remain intact On the other hand, a primary disadvantage is that cities becom overcrowded. Not only has over population a negative effects on traffic congestion, but it also is a threat to the air quality. When people move to the cities, commuting will be increased and as a result of consumption more fossil fuel, the air pollution will be increas. Furthermore, the price of accomodation see an increase, because the demand for house are rose and the landlords offer the higher price for their hiuse because of the competation between people. To conclude, it is true that increasing cities population would seem advantageous under certain sircumstanse. However, in my opinion, its negative effects in terms of air pollution and trafic congestion override the advantages.

Response: In today's world, villagers have a tendency to migrate to cities and benefit from city life. Although some feel that it is a positive trend, I firmly believe that it can have a heavy toll on our lives in three main areas. Firstly, rural individuals are moving to cities to facilitate their living conditions. While I concede that city life may increase their quality of life because of various facilities, they are more likely to suffer from air pollution in megacities. To elaborate, when people occupy green areas, the chances would be high that they breathe fresh air and be healthier than city-dwellers. As a result, by being surrounded by a large number of vehicles, factories, and other industrial equipment in cities, their well-being might be at stake. Secondly, housing is another area of concern. Many supporters to immigration from the countryside to modern cities claim that the safety and facilities of city buildings are far better and all individuals have the right to use them. However, I would argue that the more people move to cities, the more accomodations can be required to accomodate them at the expense of their security and comfort. Consequently, the constructions may no longer be in appropriate conditions. The final area which this kind of immigration has a negative impact on is the number of workers in rural areas. In other words, some occupations such as farming are far more important in villages and these sorts of jobs always need an adequate number of local workforce available. If the rural left villages to work and live in cities, we would face some workforce shortage in green areas. To conclude, not only do extreme demands for housing in cities, but they also create worker shortage in the countryside. Therefore, although I acknowledge that immigrating to cities can make the rural living conditions better, I completely disagree that it is a constructive development.

Response: In several counties, moving from rural area to live in the city has become a popular trend among individuals. While this stuation can be beneficial for increasing the number of urabn workforce, in my view, the drawbacks, such as less production of specific goods, have brought more significant consequences. The rural people have become interested in leaving their homes in the countrysides to start a new life in the cities. First of all, this trend has a vital impact on the employeement. There is a significant rise in the number of fresh and strong workforce, which also can lead to increase the availability in number of jobs. For instance, a fresh started employee strive harder to impress her or his manager by presenting new ideas. Moreover, financial investments by those people are a key factor in bringing economic stability to the city. Most of the rural people sell their properties in order to develop their lives in the city. On the other hand, the mentioned factors can be viewed from different perspectives. Firstly, the increasing population in the urabn area has detrimental effects. In this way, the unemployment rates increase, due to this, the level of poverty and crime rate will rise, too. The government cannot create enough jobs, so people undergo a pressuring condition to meet their daily needs. Additionally, the countyside is adversely affected, by land being sold to the constructors who replace fields with residental areas, and also the production of local products, such as rice, will decrease significantly, if the rural people continue to migration and leave their jobs in the countrysides. As a result, I believe that these disadvantages are more critical. In conclusion, the migration of rurals to live in the city has increased dramatically in most countries. Although this situation carries certain advantages, like growing the number of workforce, in my opinion, this trend is a negative development because of its potential drawbacks, including increasing the poverty rates and destroying green lands in the countrysides.

Response: These days, many people have immigrated from rural areas to cities to experience higher quality of life. As a result , population in rural is decreasing. while this development brings some benefits like availability of good facilities, it presents more disadvantages including, overcrowding in cities, and isolation of rural people. Rural-to-urban immigration can offer some advantages . Cities offer higher quality of life. urban areas often offer good medical and education facilities, which make life more convenient and comfortable for residents. Moreover, cities provide better employment opportunities. When individuals move to cities, they are more likely to secure better job with good job prospect and higher incomes. Therefore, many people are drawn to cities due to the convenience and ample job opportunities that they have to offer. However, moving from rural areas to urban areas often presents several drawbacks. Rural areas often face workforce shortage. Decreasing employees leads to closure and bankruptcy of different sectors and services in rural areas, which not only can decrease the quality of life for rural residences but also make them feel isolated. This can also slowdown the economic growth in rural areas. Moreover, in cities, overcrowding can place pressure on infrastructures and essential services. Therefore. Many sectors in cities have to decrease the quality of their service to meet the needs of increased population. In conclusion, although moving to cities can increase the quality of people’ live, it present some challenges like overpopulation in cities and workforces shortage in rural areas. There fore, it can be considered completely negative developments.

Response: Migration has existed since the beginning of time. In the contemporary era, the phenomenon of migration has witnessed an unprecedented surge, reflecting a significant shift in people's preferences. A debate has emerged about whether movement of countryside individuals to cities are beneficial or detrimental. I argue that the adverse repercussions of immigration, particularly in terms of economic and social impact, far outweigh the benefits, making it a largely negative development. Many opponents claim that it has far-reaching negative implications across multiple domains. Firstly, it is argued that the countryside is the main origin of producing some products, such as agricultural products, and meat. Therefore, when they abandon their job in hope of securing better occupation, they inadvertently create chaos in the food chain. As a result, food security may be endangered, and this will be resulted in increasing in costs of food as well as forcing government to import food and meat to balance the market. Secondly, critics assert that by moving people from far-flung areas to big cities, the predicaments of metropolises will rise. They cite certain studies that indicates there is a clear relationship between migration to big cities and rise in the cost of living. For instance, the price of accommodations will increase owing to the growth of demand. Moreover, critics believe that local business will face hardships to find workforces, which in turn, can lead to numerous difficulties. For example, this may reduce the profit and in some cases bankruptcy. In conclusion, while many declare that moving the rural people to cities can be a positive development, many believe it is an overly simplistic view. I firmly believe that the multitude of disadvantages derived from this, especially the negative impact on food chain, job problems, and face local businesses some problems, making it a detrimental development.

Response: In many countries, rural populations are migrating to cities, leading to a decline in countryside populations. Some people, including me, believe that this trend is beneficial, while others argue that it is detrimental. Urban areas offer more advantages compared to rural regions, including advanced infrastructure such as well-maintained roads, high-quality education, and better healthcare systems. People seeking a higher quality of life prioritize living in urban areas to access these facilities. In contrast, the lack of adequate amenities in rural areas leads to dissatisfaction and lower life expectancy. For instance, the absence of sufficient health centers can cause serious health issues for residents in these regions. Furthermore, a reduced population in rural areas can be more environmentally friendly. With fewer individuals living in the countryside, less pollution might be generated by human activities, such as greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural equipment. This makes these regions more pristine and suitable habitats for wildlife. However, some argue that migration from rural areas to urban centers can result in overpopulation, leading to a shortage of job opportunities and housing. While this is a valid concern, addressing it requires governmental intervention. Authorities should develop comprehensive strategies to construct more skyscrapers to utilize land efficiently and allocate more budgets for diverse industries to create job opportunities for the growing urban population. In conclusion, I believe urbanization is beneficial for both people and the environment. Urban residents enjoy better opportunities and an improved quality of life, while rural areas benefit from a lower population, which helps preserve the environment for wildlife. Although challenges such as urban overcrowding exist, they can be effectively managed through thoughtful planning and government policies

Response: There is a global trend in which dwellers migrate from country side to cities. As a result, the proportion of people living in rural areas decreases. I think it's a negative development due to several factors. On one hand, there are many elements that encourage people to move to metropolises. As there might not be enough facilities, many people prefer to leave. For instance, educational facilities are not advance in small villages. Consequently, when you try to have self development, moving to cities makes it possible. More over, living in a city allows you to benefit from convenient public transportation, which country side might be deprived of. So if you don't own a vehicle, commuting in rural areas may be impossible. But it doesn't seem reasonable if we only care about individuals and not the problems that it may cause. On the other hand, when rural people leave their home town, this action leads to significant problems. Firstly, agriculture is going to be consigned to oblivion as there are no farmers in towns. The lack of agriculture may be felt by both rural and urban people. As fields and farms may be left, the soil may be eroded. Moreover, cities have capacities. Thus, when many people migrates to cities, it causes problems. Take Tehran as an example. Huge number of migrants made this city crowded. Citizens suffer from high volume of traffic and congested roads. It also put dwellers in a competition to own accommodation, which increases the house prices. In conclusion, although rural people think migrating is beneficial for them, it is indeed problematic. I firmly believe that huge migration number may cause problems that seems hard to be addressed.

Response: There is a global trend in which dwellers migrate from country side to cities. As a result, the proportion of people living in rural areas decreases. I think it's a negative development due to several factors. On one hand, there are many elements that encourage people to move to metropolises. As there might not be enough facilities, many people prefer to leave. For instance, educational facilities are not advance in small villages. Consequently, when you try to have self development, moving to cities makes it possible. More over, living in a city allows you to benefit from convenient public transportation, which country side might be deprived of. So if you don't own a vehicle, commuting in rural areas may be impossible. But it doesn't seem reasonable if we only care about individuals and not the problems that it may cause. On the other hand, when rural people leave their home town, this action leads to significant problems. Firstly, agriculture is gonna be consigned to oblivion as there are no farmers in towns. The lack of agriculture may be felt by both rural and urban people. As fields and farms may be left, the soil may be eroded. Moreover, cities have capacities. Thus, when many people migrates to cities, it causes problems. Take Tehran as an example. Huge number of migrants made this city crowded. Citizens suffer from high volume of traffic and congested roads. It also put dwellers in a competition to own accommodation, which increases the house prices. In conclusion, although rural people think migrating is beneficial for them, it is indeed problematic. I firmly believe that huge migration number may cause problems that seems hard to be addressed.

Response: In contemporary society, in some countries, rural people are moving to urban areas which can decrease the population of rural areas. Although immigrating to cities can offer more opportunities for people, l think it can have a negative impact on peope and society for several reasons that I will mention in this essay. To begin with, one reason that reducing the population of the rural areas due to their immigration to big cities is a negative development is that it will increase environmental issues. The more population of the countryside drops, The more population of cities grows, leading to a rise in consumption and traffic, contributing factors to both air and noise pollutions. For example, if people want to live in the cities, they will need to meet accomodation needs by working, which can lead to growth in cars due to commuting, and a rise in green house gases, which can exacerbate environmental problems. Moreover, another reason that decreasing the population of rural areas is a negative development is that it can undermine the local economy. If the majority of people move to big cities, there will be no labour force for rural jobs such as farming, station industries. For instance, people working as stockbreeders provide governements with diary products such as cheese, milk, and even meat that if their workforce decreases, it will has the potential to adversely affect on food production, which is important in the export market due to improving the local economy. In conclusion, l believe that when rural people move to cities and reduce their populaton in the countryside can bring several drawbacks due to its potential to impact on people's population in big cities, hinder exporting food production, and underminer the local economy.

Response: The number of people travelling from countrysides toward capitals and big cities around the world is on the rise. This trend is causing problems for rural areas as well as bringing drawbacks to cities which of both require careful consideration. However, the negative aspects of this migrating pattern deserve careful attention which I will elaborate on in the following essay. On the one hand, as village settlers move to mega cities, the population of manpower in those remote areas will drop significantly, which have negative effects on both industries and local residents. First and foremost, in terms of industrial aspect, the companies in such places encounter a lack of a sufficient workforce because the skilled workers have travelled to big cities in search of better job prospects and higher income. In this context, employers are obliged to pay higher wages to adept worker for commuting long distances from other adjacent towns which has a direct detrimental influence on the domestic economy. Additionaly, this trend not only poses a threat to organisations, but also forces locals to face the consequences of this situation. For example, if a person wants to repair impaired equipment in their house in those remote regions, they will have to bring in an expert from another cities within the country which is undoubtedly costly and daunting. On the flip side, as a result of the growing population rate in destination cities, concerns including poorer air quality, a polluted environment, and a lack of decent jobs for city dwellers are inevitable. As an illustration, the more citizens work, the more fossil fuel is needed to operate private and public transport vehicles which considerably contributes to pollution in the weather and environment due to emitting a high amount of carbon dioxide and exhaust emissions. Furthermore, as demands for jobs escalate in overcrowded capital cities,the unemployment rate will assuredly surge, necessitating immediate measures to address the issue; otherwise, negative outcomes become impossible to mend. In conclusion, as indicated above, the migration of people from rural areas to urban ones is considered an undesirable process that has multifaceted drawbacks for both environments, such as increasing the unemployment rate in metropolises along with decreasing the workforce in remote regions. I firmly believe this pattern is the last thing every nation wants.