IELTS Writing Samples

Response: Many argue that the number of days that people should work during a week needs to be decreased. This essay supports this notion because it can benefit both establishments and societies. Firstly, well-rested employees will have higher performance, and secondly, family bonds will become stronger when they spend more time together. On one hand, the more time people have to wind down after a week of hard work, the sharper their minds will be in the following week. In other words, lack of proper rest will result in exhausted workers, who are more prone to making serious mistakes. Consequently, the company's overall outcome will be detrimentally affected. Therefore, providing employees with an additional day off not only boosts workers productivity, but also enhances the company's performance. For instance, in the UAE, most companies are launching a program that entails a three-day weekend. On the other hand, if people become too immersed in their work and do not have enough time to spend quality time with their families, their loved ones can be adversely affected. As a result, society could face greater challenges. For example, in the USA, since working all day is considered a value, many families have broken apart. This phenomenon has caused many children to suffer from behavioural difficulties, which, by a snowball effect, will deteriorate companies' performance in the future. In conclusion, this essay believes it is a good strategy to shorten the working week because it can enhance the output of companies, as well as mitigate the risk of social challenges.

Response: The illustration displays the layout of the Porth harbour now and in 2000. Overall, the number of docks has increased to two and the fishing boats area and private yachts area have swapped places. Additionally, another showers and toilets building has been added to the harbour, as well as a complex for cafes and shops and a hotel, which has replaced the disused castle. Regarding the immediate function of the harbour, the space for fishing boats and the marina, which is the area for private yachts, has switched places. Additionally, another dock, where ferries can board passengers, has been integrated into the harbour beside the north public beach. In relation to other facilities, some renovations have been carried out, too. One of them is the construction of another building for showers and toilets along the new marina which is under the fishing boats area in the larger space. Additionally, access to the parking lot beside this new building has moved to Man Road instead of the road that leads to the Lifeboat. Furthermore, next to the Lifeboat, a complex for cafes and shops has been developed. Finally, the former out-of-use castle has been redefined as the new hotel with a private beach, which used to be the south public beach.

Response: There has been some discussion that both public and authorities will be efficient in reducing work time to 6 hours a day, others do not agree with. In this essay I will support my view with examples. It is perceived by some people that reducing work time to 6 hours helps people to spend more time with their families. It is obvious that, when individuals take more hours to rest it helps them to have a free time engage in leisure activities with their families. Moreover, when public devotes clear time to their jobs it can helps them to concentrate on their relationships and improve their communication. Therefore, reducing time encourages people to provide better relationships with their families and allocate more time for leisure activities. On the other hand, some others including me believe that reducing time to 6 hours a day creates some problems . First and foremost, by diminishing work time nations can be unable to afford their life requirements . This is due to financial problems in purchasing their necessary items they encounter to troubles. Needless to say , people unable to carry out work which related to administrative tasks . For example, someone who wants to pay utility bills to banks may not have enough time to do it so this lead to overcrowding and chaos . So, making people poorer and causing disorders in society are some challenges that nations will face . In conclusion, although work time reduction allows people to spend more time with their families and provides happier moments for them but based on other idea it brings some troubles such as pushing families in to the lower class of society and creating chaos in daily life.

Response: It is a common belief that saving money would be beneficial for every individual including younger generations. People who side with this idea, often fear rainy days, such as sudden illnesses or natural incidents that their occurrence is impossible to predict. In this essay, I will discuss my disagreement towards laying money aside and argue why I believe that this type of financial behavior is an impractical piece of advice, considering inflation in today’s global economy. Back in the day, Generation Z were encouraged to put their spare change in piggy banks. Nowadays, people from this generation who just started their professional journey disapprove of saving for their future. They use their income on short trips, buying fancy items and et cetra; which is due to witnessing money losing its value over time. In fact, younger generations realized that no matter how much money they save throughout a year, as time passes, the amount of laid money is not as valuable as it was last year. Consequently, Generation z decided to use their cash for shot-term purposes. In addition, a practical solution would be creating an investing portfolio as advised by many economists. If circumstances are right and the investment does not fail, it is likely that investors not only overcome inflation, but also take a noticeable profit. Moreover, upon unfortunate events, individuals can stop investment and take their money back. In conclusion, laying money aside has been proved to disappoint younger generations because of the value of the money which decreases, yearly. Although many still insist on saving for the future, there are better alternatives to overcome financial problems, which are far more profitable than saving it. Furthuremore, I firmly believe investmet must be taken more seriously rather than saving.

Response: It is often said that music has the power to unite and connect people, regardless of their cultural backgrounds or ages. I completely agree with this view, and will give my reasons below. Music can certainly reach across cultural and national boundaries and bring people together. Perhaps the best example of this would be the Live Aid concerts that took place back in the 1980s, and which were broadcast to a global audience. Two live events were held simultaneously in the UK and the US, and the objective was to raise funds for famine relief in Ethiopia. The concerts were a huge success, both in terms of the number of people around the world who watched them and their impact on international public awareness of the famine. They demonstrated, I believe, that music truly is the planet’s global language. Just as it transcends cultures, music also has the ability to connect people from different generations. Regardless of age, we can all enjoy a memorable melody, a strong rhythm or a beautiful singing voice, and the best songs seem to have the same magical effect on all of us. This would explain why televised music competitions, such as ‘The X Factor’ or ‘The Voice’, are such popular prime-time shows. These programmes attract incredibly broad audiences because singing and popular songs appeal to children, parents and grandparents alike. I would argue that no other form of entertainment can bring families together in this way. In conclusion, I believe that music is unique in its capacity to create shared experiences between people, irrespective of culture and age.

Response: Spending time for studying continues to be controversial for many university students throughout the world and the question of whether to focus on the main university subject or to learn multiple subjects beside the main one is very topical these days. It is obvious that there are strong views on both sides which I will discuss now. On the one hand, opponents of focusing on just main subject believe that this view have several significant advantages for students. Firstly, focusing solely on one subject allows people to achieve higher academic levels, as well as a strong foundation of future studies or research. Secondly, expertise is ensured to students by studying just one university subjects deeply during their graduations which is essential for their future careers Finally, not only may taking additional courses require extra tuition fees and effort but it also spend excessive time for acquiring numerous skills which is not be necessary for career success. conversely, advocates of learning several skills next to the main subjects believe that it would provide better job prospects and also help to broader students knowledge and skills which means that they will increase their recruiting chance from employers by specialising in fields such as business management, communications, and programming .Moreover, the more multi-skill individuals foster are fostered at universities , the more skillful specialists with the highest qualifications and scientific literacy allocating their time to do groundbreaking research and innovate break through discoveries. In conclusion, while it is crucial for students to focus on their main subjects with the purpose of gaining expertise , I completely believe that universities ought to incorporate a few essential compulsory subjects include communication skills, financial management alongside the main one which can be completely benefit to the students in their future.

Response: Many school aged individuals prefer to learn diverse skills, although others hold the opinion that they ought to solely focuse on studying for a qualification. From my perspective, they would better only pay attention to their lessons in school. On the one hand, learning additional skills offers multitude of benefits. Not only does it contribute to enhancing our mental power, but it also increases our self-confidence. For instance, according to a survey conducted by prominent researchers at the Oxford University, the more people are engaged with artistic subjects, the better they can performe in their scientific major. This is a universally aknowledged truth that working in various artistic fields leads to creativity and initiative which build students' self-confidence. On the other hand, concentrated individuals in their expertise will become invaluable spacialists. Indeed, underestimating the importance of these experts in the society is illogical because they can cause scientific advancements. As an illustration we can take the Internet into account which revolutionized our lives in many aspects. For example, due to this technological revolution, people have this opportunity to intract with others regardless of their location, particularly in scientific courses it can be veritably useful. To clarify, the old friend of mine attended a Python course under the supervision of a knowledgeable professor at the MIT University, while he is living in Iran and he became a priceless teacher in this field, last year. Therefore, if students concentrate on studying and learning science, society will take the advantages. In conclusion, even though learning numerous skills like painting and playing musical instruments may improve students' abilities, I firmly believe that the society enhancement is more imprative. In other words, students should strive to find solutions for wide-ranging issues.

Response: In the increasingly digitalized world, school-aged people spend long hours on utilizing their cold hard digital devices. From my perspective, this is because they are streamlined with the World Wide Web which is unlimited and I consider it as a positive development. On the one hand, tampering with the cellphones may negatively affect children's health. To clarify, they usually spend a vast amount of their spare time playing online games. Not only does it endanger their physical well-being, but it also can pose a threat to their mental health. Indeed, the more they gaze into their smartphones, the more they may suffer from poor eye-sight and spinal-related matters. Moreover, since during playing online games they should assisst characters by killing and stabing, they will encounter with some problems like anxiety, stress and depression. This is because they cannot distinguish between real world and visual world. On the other hand, enganging with online games comes with multitude benefits. For instance, it leads to eye, brain and hand coordination because while children are playing, there are various commands that must be transmitted from brain to other organs of the body. Furthermore, a wide variety of applications related to education are installed on school aged children's smartphones. As a result of technological revolution individuals have easy access to a wide range of information, and they can benefit frome numerous online courses regardless of their location. As an illustration, my old friend took part in a Python course under the supervision of a knowledgeable professor in Oxford university last year, while he was living in Iran. In conclusion, even though if children do not utilize thier smart gadgets like cellphones properly, they might threaten their physical and psycological well-being, I firmly believe that they improve coordinating individuals' eye, brain and hand. Nevertheless, they are able to enhance their knowledge using their smart gadgets. Therefore the pros outweigh the cons.

Response: It is argued that people are able to buy food which is not produced in their countries. In my view, this development brings several positive effects, including people have the chance to consume healthy food and improve their knowledge about the culture of countries. What makes buying food a positive development is that people are able to access several healthy food which is not produced in their countries. In other words, although food consists of several healthy elements, such as vitamins, people can consume limited types of food in their countries due to some barriers such as weather conditions. By way of example, Sushi is known to be a type of food is high in beneficial proteins which play vital role in physical health. Now, Iranian consumers enable to consume this type of food in Iran since people can find food around the world in Iranian supermarkets. Therefore, the spreading of food around the world provides the opportunity to people to consume several healthy food, resulting in them being able to be healthy longer. Moreover, food is able to reflect cultural traits. This is because types of food highly depend on the culture differences. These differences give consumers chances to broaden their knowledge about culture differences of countries. For instance, Hindi food is known to be spicy since it includes red pepper, and todays, Iranian consumers tend to learn about the culture of India since this food can be found as easily as Iranian one in Iran. Hence, by consuming international food, people have the chance to improve their knowledge about the culture of countries. In conclusion, I find this development totally positive since people not only have chances to buy various healthy food which cannot produce in their countries but also have chances to enhance their knowledge about the culture of countries.

Response: It is argued that everyone should save money for the future and young people are no exception. I firmly agree with this idea since saving money brings several rewarding effects, including teching the way of saving money and prevention young people from facing financial problems. What makes save money for their future of young people vital is that they have the chance to gain several financial experiments. In other words, they might have not massive responsibilities as many as their old ones, resulting in they have the chance to try several ways in order to save money. By way of example, technology gives opportunties to young people to save their money in several ways, such as buying gold and bitcoins. It is highly possible that they lose thier money; however, they might learn what the most reliable way for saving money is, and they might not take risks when they become older. Therefore, This approach not only provides financial stabilities in the long term , but also teaches countless various financial skills. Moreover, young people will tend to live independently in the future. This means that, while their parents might support them financially when they live with their parents, when they decide to live alone, it is highly possible that their parents cannot support them, and if they did not save money, they would face several financial problems such as going bankrupt. Hence, saving money enables them to live independently in the future. In conclusion, I support the idea since it not only provides the opportunity to young people to learn about various ways of saving money, but also prevents them form potential financial issues in the future.