Task Achievement:
The essay effectively addresses the prompt by presenting a clear and well-supported argument in favor of music’s ability to unite people across cultures and ages. The response includes relevant examples (Live Aid concerts, televised music competitions) that strengthen the argument. However, the essay could benefit from a brief acknowledgment of potential counterarguments (e.g., some genres may not appeal universally) to demonstrate a more balanced perspective.
Coherence and Cohesion:
The essay is logically structured, with a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion. Each paragraph flows smoothly, and cohesive devices (e.g., "Perhaps the best example," "Just as it transcends cultures") help guide the reader. However, some transitions between ideas could be slightly smoother—for instance, the shift from cultural unity to generational connection feels abrupt.
Lexical Resource:
The vocabulary is varied and appropriate (e.g., "transcends cultures," "memorable melody," "prime-time shows"). However, there is room for more sophisticated or nuanced word choices in places (e.g., "huge success" could be replaced with "resounding success" or "unprecedented achievement"). Additionally, some phrases are slightly repetitive (e.g., "bring people together" appears multiple times).
Grammatical Range and Accuracy:
The grammar is mostly accurate, with a good mix of complex and simple sentence structures. However, there are minor issues, such as the phrase "Two live events were held simultaneously in the UK and the US, and the objective was..." which could be more concise (e.g., "Simultaneously held in the UK and the US, the events aimed to..."). A few sentences could also be refined for greater clarity (e.g., "They demonstrated, I believe, that music truly is the planet’s global language" could be more direct: "They demonstrated that music is a universal language.").
Overall, the essay is well-argued and coherent but could benefit from minor refinements in structure, vocabulary, and balance.