This section presents a professionally wirtten variation of your essay and highlights the differences.
Migration has existed since the beginning of time. In the contemporary era, the phenomenon of migration has witnessed an unprecedented surge, reflecting a significant shift in people's preferences. A debate has emerged about whether movement of countryside individuals to cities are beneficial or detrimental. I argue that the adverse repercussions of immigration, particularly in terms of economic and social impact, far outweigh the benefits, making it a largely negative development.
Migration has existed since the beginning of time. In the contemporary era, the phenomenon of migration has witnessed an unprecedented surge, reflecting a significant shift in people's preferences. A debate has emerged about whether the movement of individuals from rural areas to cities is beneficial or detrimental. I argue that the adverse repercussions of migration, particularly in terms of economic and social impact, far outweigh the benefits, making it a largely negative development.
Many opponents claim that it has far-reaching negative implications across multiple domains. Firstly, it is argued that the countryside is the main origin of producing some products, such as agricultural products, and meat. Therefore, when they abandon their job in hope of securing better occupation, they inadvertently create chaos in the food chain. As a result, food security may be endangered, and this will be resulted in increasing in costs of food as well as forcing government to import food and meat to balance the market.
Many opponents claim that migration has far-reaching negative implications across multiple domains. Firstly, it is argued that rural areas are the primary source of essential products, such as agricultural goods and meat. Therefore, when individuals abandon their jobs in hopes of securing better employment opportunities, they inadvertently create chaos in the food supply chain. As a result, food security may be endangered, leading to an increase in food costs and forcing governments to import food and meat to stabilize the market.
Secondly, critics assert that by moving people from far-flung areas to big cities, the predicaments of metropolises will rise. They cite certain studies that indicates there is a clear relationship between migration to big cities and rise in the cost of living. For instance, the price of accommodations will increase owing to the growth of demand. Moreover, critics believe that local business will face hardships to find workforces, which in turn, can lead to numerous difficulties. For example, this may reduce the profit and in some cases bankruptcy.
Secondly, critics assert that relocating people from remote areas to large cities exacerbates the challenges faced by urban centers. They cite studies indicating a clear relationship between migration to big cities and a rise in the cost of living. For instance, the price of accommodation increases due to heightened demand. Moreover, critics believe that local businesses will struggle to find a workforce, which can lead to numerous difficulties, such as reduced profits and, in some cases, bankruptcy.
In conclusion, while many declare that moving the rural people to cities can be a positive development, many believe it is an overly simplistic view. I firmly believe that the multitude of disadvantages derived from this, especially the negative impact on food chain, job problems, and face local businesses some problems, making it a detrimental development.
In conclusion, while many argue that relocating rural populations to cities can be a positive development, this perspective is overly simplistic. I firmly believe that the multitude of disadvantages stemming from this trend—particularly the negative impact on the food supply chain, job market challenges, and the difficulties faced by local businesses—renders it a detrimental development.