IELTS Writing Samples

Response: In recent years, citizens living in several countries have become curious to gather data about the property they inhabit. I assume that there are several primary reasons for this trend. As a citizen who is keen to find some information about the background of your home, you can have access it with some simple ways. First and foremost, as soon as the owners purchase a property they tend to renovate interior design because in many cases the design is not according to their tastes. Consequently, they need to collect relevant data about the infrastructure of that home such as the location of pipes and electricity wires to decrease possible dangers. In other words, it is highly crucial for designers to have enough knowledge about the infrastructure to lower the costs and increase the security while they are demolishing. Additionally, many houses are precious historically as they were built many years ago and it is the owners’ responsibility to preserve them as cultural heritage. In other words, cities and towns are identified by these historical buildings. To find and collect relevant data, people can get some help from previous owners especially when they are going to redesign the home. They can help the current owner with showing them the property layout. They can also introduce the previous designer and civil engineer to guide the current owner more. Furthermore, in regards of ancient buildings, individual can find practical information from governmental centers as the majority of these buildings maps and information are preserved there. To explain more, ancient architecture is part of cultural heritage and it is the responsibility of governments to preserve them as a result owners can find a lot of information about the background of their building. In conclusion, people have become keener to gather information about the history behind their properties. The main reasons for this trend first can be because of declining dangers during renovation and second to maintain ancient properties as they are considered to be a remarkable landmark

Response: Nowadays people prefer to choose work for their selves(self-employed), rather than working for companies or organization. In my opinion each of the them have some advantages and some disadvantages. Although self- employed apparently shows full of opportunities rather than working for organization but many hide aspects of it should be mentioned and assess more carefully. First of all, it is abviouse that if people work for their selves they gain many advantages. For instant, when I worked in my bessines I had had flexible time while I had to work harder than before but my income drastically increased in comparison between same time working for employe. However working for myself helped me to raise self-development also expand my vision and flexibility in harsh time. People should be improved acceptance about fail because there is nothings steady in any market. Although self-employed seems more comfortable but it depends on many factors. If people expanded data about it, self-employed would be work. If you are more challangable person than employees it is good for you. Also people should be take different risk, unlimited time work and possibility for fail. For example, while I accepted all features that I mentioned already Pandemic in 2020 accured suddenly and I failed my bussines. As a consequence, while most of the people prefer to work for their selves I believe that few number of them strongly follow this and if they getting more information about this approach they may change attitudes.

Response: There has been a debate among people whether experts, including medical practitioners and engineers, should be allowed to gain experience in a country while working in domestic areas or work overseas in other countries. Both views have their own advantages which require careful consideration. Personally, I believe that having autonomy to pursue their passion is matter of importance I will elaborate on my reasons in this essay. On one hand, after spending several years at universities, majoring in a specific field of study, gaining work-related experience is crucial for professionals, because without proper empirical knowledge, earning high salaries would be impossible. In this context, some prominent workers like engineers choose to follow their dream on global scale which is highly recommended due to the benefits, such as high salary offered by international corporations, job entitlements, and things along those lines. For example, an engineer from a developing country is likely to be paid the standard salary in his or her homeland in comparison with their counterparts who have been employed in well-paying job positions at international organizations in developed countries. On the flip side, there are numerous merits associated with working in domestic companies. First and foremost, the cultural and language barriers which are the major difficulties for international applicants, are no longer two concerns for domestic workers. As a result, they are close to their family and friends which leads them toward happier life. For instance, as daily news reports highlight repeatedly that those who work close to their neighborhood experienc a much happier life than their peers who are working in a remote location, in an isolated environment. Additionally, every government plans to enact laws to oblige employers to support their domestic employees in order to encourage their youger generation not to leave their home country and put an end to the trend of brain drain which contributes greatly to establishing better working environment for domestic experts. In conclusion, as discussed above, professionals should have certain level of freedom to choose to work whether in their own country or to work globally, each of which have their own privileges which should be taken into accounts. My opinion is a neutral one which subscribe to the view that this decision should be left to professionals to consider the situation based on their own preference.

Response: Evidence suggest that kids are often told that they are able to fulfill whatever they want, providing that they put efforts efficiently. Although there are a number of drawbacks involved in this trend, the benefits accuring to that are by no means negligible. On the one hand, the advantage for giving children this message is manifold. To begin with, this message provides a source of inspiration for them. What I mean is that, this message persuade children to work hard and concentrate on their aspirations to achieve them. As a result, they would develop some skills such as creativity, time management, leadership and so on which are beneficial for their future. The more they are dedicated, the more chance they have to accopmlish their aims. Form an educational level, they would pass their tests with flying colors. Howerver, the downside cannot be ignored. The most axiomatic argument of this message is that young children devote all their hours to achieve what they wish. This can have negative effects on their relationship with their families and friends. Take students who sorely study their lessons and do not interact with their peers at school as a compelling example. They are likely to suffer from loneliness and thay are lack of social skills which are essential in today's world. Another reprecussion worth mentioning is that if their efforts would not paid off, they may feel disappinted and it affects on their future goals as well. In conclisuion, having considered the argument above, giving this message to the children that if you work hard, you will achieve your objectives can be both rewarding and problemaic.

Response: In the current climate, automation of vehicles has immensely sparked a heated debate. It has been claimed that private cars and vehicles of public transportation system will no need drivers any more in the following years. I, for one, believe that the drawbacks of this status pale in comparison to its benefits. There exist a few disadvantages of driverless automobiles. Firstly and most importantly, travelers may not be able to control the movement of cars, so this can, in turn, create numerous challenges. Take, for instance, a person who has aimed to take a relatively long journey, which might take more than 5 hours. They probably want to get off to use toilets, for example, or enjoy the breathtaking scenery if the route is scenic. This is while traveling with a driver has not this downside and passengers can get on and off whenever they intend to. On the other hand, automatic buses and trucks can have several merits. Trips are likely to become more affordable as there is no need for drivers being paid. As axiomatic as it may sound, when going on trips is cheaper, an increasing numbder of people can experience traveling. This is shown by a research carried out by Dr. Johnes from the University of California, arguing that using driverless vehicles leads to an increase of virtually 35 percent in taking trips. Furthermore, trips seem to be much safer. It cannot be overlooked that the number of human errors can be on the rise, more specifically in long, tiring journeys. Robots and computers, however, are not affected by environmental conditions and tend to have a steady function. Consequently passengers can benefit from this safety. What can be concluded from the above is that I am of the opinion that the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the demeits since traveling may become much more affordable and, at the same time, less dangerous.

Response: In the 21st century, with the advent of social media and TV programs, people are more educated than they were in the last decades, particularly in the field of healthcare. This knowledge leads them to adopt self-healing practices or rely on traditional methods rather than visiting their family doctor or general practitioner. This trend has both advantages and disadvantages. I believe that in some cases it may be useful, or vice versa, it may be detrimental to individual's health in case of indiscriminate use of drugs. On one hand, regarding advantages, it is often said by scientists that chemical drugs, regardless of dosage, are beyond the body needs. This means that our natural body environment is capable of healing itself after having enough time to rest and consuming nutritious meals. It is convincing when it comes to common diseases, such as flu and cold. In this case, after experiencing symptoms, including running nose, headache, fever, and things on those lines, traditional remedies are convenient alternative for chemical drugs prescribed by doctors, or even in more serious cases, acupuncture is highly recommended by traditional practitioners. Therefore, not only would this alternative approach contribute to saving money, but it would also avoid the need to visit a family doctor. Additionally, it can enhance the level of our immune system, because daily news reports repeatedly highlighted that many people have become poisoned as a result of excessive usage of expired drugs offered in illegal market, whether it is prescribed by doctors or not. On the flip side, medical experts have spent an inordinate number of years studying the body environment of human in order to detect and find solutions for different ailments relating to living organs. Hence, according to their research, indicating that minor symptoms should be considered as important as major ones since they can have negative outcomes. Consequently, it is advisable to keep your health in check regularly with your doctor and visit your general practitoner on a regular basis, in order to recognise malfunctioning of internal organs at an early stage of development for further medical treatment. In this context, alternative medicine is undoubtedly not advisable. In conclusion, as discussed above, despite the fact that citizens have become more alert and aware of their natural body behaviour, thanks to media; there are numerous things that they are still not aware of and are unclean to them, including medical-related subjects. Although some people have found that they can address common diseases with alternative medicines, like herbal and traditional methods, visiting their usual doctor is still important because there may be underlying conditions that can threaten their lives.

Response: In the present climate, accommodation has become a significant matter among citizens. Most of them prefer to become landlords rather than rent a home because of some reasons such as shortage of accommodation and social issues also it may bring some positive aspects for them. Shortage of affordable housing is one of the reasons that the majority of people tend to buy a home of their own. Discovering a suitable place with fully fitted is a challenging issue, tenants have to rent a home for a short time and throw away a great deal of money in it. As a result, one will decide to take out mortgages to purchase their favorite home or even an old accommodation and remodel it of their interest. moreover, the inflation rate is increasing day by day which has a direct connection to the cost of housing. It means that there is not a strict balance between income and an individual’s expenditure therefore it may be difficult to pay rent. On the other hand, freeholder has several positive effects both materially and mentally. Purchasing a place is the best way to invest. If society invests their money in accommodations, they can guarantee their retirement and put them as heritages for their children. Moving from one place to another place is stressful and leaseholders tolerate it. Therefore, having a home of their own not only can reduce this tension and anxiety but also can experience a healthy life without any problems with housing and let them focus on solving other problems in their life. To sum up, these days most societies have been conscious of investing their wealth to buy a place to reside there as finding affordable housing has become challenging and the cost of houses is rising these days also it can cause some positive pluses such as mental health as well as allow them to save money.

Response: In this day and ages, many people are curious about the history of the building they live in. their accommodation. One pivotal factor that makes people interested in searching about the background of the place they live can be safety concerns. Since the majority of people, specially in urban areas, live in modern apartment they want to be aware of the structure they live in. for example, some buildings are belt based on strike safety regulation. These buildings are more resistant against national disasters including, earthquake and tornadoes, making them a reliable place to live. Furthermore, with regard to older buildings people often are eager to now about some issues such as how old the building is or how many people lived there before. In this case, searching about the history of the building generally holds sentimental values, helping the current inhabitant to make emotional connection to the place. In order to gain information about the history of the building there can be several ways. First of all regarding modern building people have access to the constructors so they can ask whatever they need to no directly or they can ask an expert in the field to visit their house to whether safety rules are followed or not. And for older building, people who are interested in knowing about history can ask any question from neighbors or if the building is historical they can refer to city council for further information. In conclusion, peoples’ curiosity about the background of the building they live in can be stem from consequence of factors, including safety and emotional issues. In order to address this multifaceted issue people can receive information from builders, neighbors, and city council.

Response: There is an opinion (asserting) that individuals, particularly young people, should save money for their future (life). I completely agree with the given statement due to several compelling reasons. Saving money is crucial as it can provide financial security during unexpected life events.For instance, money saved over time can help cover urgent expenses, such as medical bills or vehicle repairs after an accident. These events are unpredictable and may require immediate access to funds. If individuals have saved money in advance, they will be better prepared to handle such situations with fewer long-term consequences. Another key reason for young people to save money is that it is essential for achieving personal and professional goals. Higher education, for example, often requires significant financial resources to cover costs such as textbooks and accommodatation. Many students are unable to work part-time due to restrictions, so having saved money ensures they can continue their studies without financial strain. Moreover, saving money is essential for enterpreneurs. By setting aside funds, they can invest in their business ventures, leading to long-term success and growth. As a result, financial preparation early on can support both education and career advancement. In conclusion, saving money is essential for young people to handle unexpected events and achieve their future goals. I firmly believe that having finacial resources is key to both personal development and professional success, and the earlier one starts saving, the better prepared they will be for life’s challenges.

Response: In today's world, villagers have a tendency to migrate to cities and benefit from city life. Although some feel that it is a positive trend, I firmly believe that it can have a heavy toll on our lives in three main areas. Firstly, rural individuals are moving to cities to facilitate their living conditions. While I concede that city life may increase their quality of life because of various facilities, they are more likely to suffer from air pollution in megacities. To elaborate, when people occupy green areas, the chances would be high that they breathe fresh air and be healthier than city-dwellers. As a result, by being surrounded by a large number of vehicles, factories, and other industrial equipment in cities, their well-being might be at stake. Secondly, housing is another area of concern. Many supporters to immigration from the countryside to modern cities claim that the safety and facilities of city buildings are far better and all individuals have the right to use them. However, I would argue that the more people move to cities, the more accomodations can be required to accomodate them at the expense of their security and comfort. Consequently, the constructions may no longer be in appropriate conditions. The final area which this kind of immigration has a negative impact on is the number of workers in rural areas. In other words, some occupations such as farming are far more important in villages and these sorts of jobs always need an adequate number of local workforce available. If the rural left villages to work and live in cities, we would face some workforce shortage in green areas. To conclude, not only do extreme demands for housing in cities, but they also create worker shortage in the countryside. Therefore, although I acknowledge that immigrating to cities can make the rural living conditions better, I completely disagree that it is a constructive development.