IELTS Writing Samples

Response: There is an opinion asserting that individuals, particularly youngsters, should save money for their future life. I completely agree with the given statement on the basis of several compelling reasons. Saving money is important for individuals, as it may be required in unexpected occasions in life. To begin with, the money which has been gradually saved over several years, may be consumed to provide financial venue for times of need. That is, unexpected life events requiring immediate access to a sufficient financial supply are possible to happen in everyone’s life. An example of this is road traffic accidents, in which individuals may encounter severe personal or vehicle damages necessitating a great deal of expenditure to repair their damaged vehicles or provide medical care. Having an adequate amount of saved money, individuals might be able to overcome these challenges with less long-term repercussions. Another reason justifying the idea of saving money by individuals, particularly the young population, is that this approach is fundamental to achieving personal and professional goals. Continuing education at advanced academic levels usually requires a sophisticated financial support to facilitate buying educational materials, such as books, and ensure appropriate accommodation facilities. It is further highlighted by the fact that many college students are not allowed to participate in temporary off-campus work to earn money. Therefore,when individuals save their money over a period of years, they may use this saving to cover their life expenses during education. Moreover, some careers such as business, require an ongoing means of finance to ensure stability and success. If people are encouraged to save their money from the beginning of their career, they will be able to develop their business corporation and make significant profits through investing a portion of their saved money in various venues. This would facilitate the overall growth of their company. In conclusion, individuals particularly young people should be motivated to save their money for future life events. It is my firm conviction that personal and professional development requires a sufficient amount of money, which is possibly maintained from the saved amount of money over several years. Additionally, having adequate financial savings provides support for individuals in cases of unforessen life situations, such as accidents.

Response: There is no doubt that rivals make each other better. While some people think that having rivalry at the workplace, school, and everyday life is not a good thing, I would argue that why it is beneficial for people. Competing in a group instead of cooperation between members can hurt the outcome of an organisation. This is because while people are fighting with each other to gain a better position, some great ideas can be missing. For example, consider an advertisement company where employees are trying to sabotage other models, so they can get the promotion, and it can damage the creativity of the whole system, and they might lose clients. Conversely, if those people work together, they would gain a significant profit. Competition can make humans try harder in order to reach higher positions. It is clear that people can be more creative and hardworking when there are other rivals. For instance, imagine a car factory where there are several designers, and their boss attends a race and prepares a prize for the winner of the best design. At this moment, everyone will do their best to achieve the glory of being the best and win the prize, so the company will gain benefits and its designs will be better. On the opposite, if there is only one designer, he wont bother himself to create a new model. In conclusion, although partnership can boost the quality of the workplace and school, in my view, competition in a healthy environment can improve the entire system.

Response: It is discussed that in the future world, there will be no human as a driver in personal or public vehicles, tehy can just play the role of passengers. It means that all the transportation system will be driveless. Literally, I think this change will be a positive trend, and it will bring more saftey and more convenience to people. My reasons will be discussed in this essay. To begin with, we all claim that advanced devices and robots, such as driveless vehicles, can perform more accurate and more precise than human, and of course, they will have less error cofficient. It is argued that these vehicles are programmed to drive in a safe speed, and act considerately. Therefore, the accidents' rate will decrease dramatically, and we can garantee more safety for passengers who will use these high-tech vehicles. Moreover, these development in transportation industry will provide people with more comfortable travelling and commuting. In other words, they can easily relax in a vehicle without considering different environmental conditions, such as road or even weather conditions. Furthermore they will have a far better experience during their commuting. However, it is acknowledged by some people that this development can reduce many job opportunities in driving field. They also claim that many emergency decisions can be made better by a human rather than a machine. Despite all the above reasons, I think this advancement in travelling procedure can bring more advantages for communities. Nevertheless the merits of the driveless vehicles overshadow the demerits. To conclude, I believe that future vehicles without drivers will play a significant role in improving many different aspects of a society, from the passengers' safety to their welfare.

Response: People have different views about whether professionals should work. While some argue that people who work in the medical field and enginnering should work in the nation where they gained their qualifications, others believe that they should feel free to choose the country whhere they wish to work. This essay will discuss both these points of view and argue in favour of the latter. On the one hand, there are two reasons why it could be argued that it is mandatory for doctors and engineers to purue their career in the country where they learned their professions. The main reason for this belief is that these jobs have particular theories which are merely appropriate for the nation where they are tought. Take rules of constructing buildings in civil engineering as an example. These building laws are different in each place which makes it difficult to apply them in various nations. Moreover, another compelling reason justifying this assertion is that professionals should help the residents of the country where they did their training. It is a form of apprecietaion for the facilities that universities in that country which are provided to gain their qualifications. On the other hand, the opposing view asserts that professionals can work in any country if they wish. I agree with this prespective for two reasons. The primary reason is that if we put pressure on doctros and engineers to work in special area, the may lose their interest and as a result they cannot work effectively. A good illustration of this is that the doctors and nurses who sent to the deprived areas of the country. They usually suffer from emotional diseases such as depression and are not able to treat patients propperly. Secondly, many engineers are high-qualified students who immigrated to developed countries to further their education. As a result, when they finish their study, they will return to their own countries. In conclusion, although opinions differ on whether it should be compulsory to professionals to do their jobs in the country where did their education or not, I firmly convicted that they should make decision for their location of job as it can boost their productivity.

Response: Diverse perspectives regarding the most significant environmental problem in the present time are prevalent among individuals. While some argue that the primary environmental issue is the extinction of particular species of animals and plant, Others think that there are more preferable environmental issues. Personally. I believe that the latter view is more substantial. This essay will critically examine both facets of the argument with a detailed explanation. On the one hand, many support the idea of attention to other environmental subjects are more essential, such as global warming and air pollution. This is because rising temperature can change many natural habitats and destroying them due to the changing natural environmental condition. For instance, global warming threaten life of polars bears, which need to cold temperature for surviving, by melting the polar ice caps. Additionally, air pollution by pollution the environment can cause numerous diseases, such as asthma. As a result, warming the temperature and air pollution are the most detrimental for human, plants, and animals. On the other hand, some argue that extinction of particular species of plants and animals can lead to loss of biodiversity and effect on our food chain. When endangered species become extinct, it can reduce the biodiversity, which is very significant for food products we consume. This is because some species are important in our food chain because some specific features, namely, drought resistance and water resistance. For example, scientist use these resistance genes for other species which are more vulnerable specially food crops. In conclusion, despite the potential benefits of protecting particular species of plants and animal, I strongly believe that other serious environmental problems are more significant including global warming and air pollution.

Response: Diverse perspectives regarding acceptance and alteration a bad bad situation are prevalent among individuals. Some individuals argue that the best approach in bad situation is receptivity, others think that it is better to attempt and enhance these situations. Personally, I believe that trying for chang offers several substantial benefits. This essay will critically examine both facets of the argument with explanation. On the one hand, many support the idea of attempting for improve because it can lead to numerous positive outcomes, such as acquire new skills and progress. If someone wants to change a bad condition for better, they will examine all the possible solutions. Consequently, they can learn many new skills and experiences, and they are more likely to achieve success than other. Additionally. they strengthen their dedication and hard-working. For instance, if a student fail to accept in their favorite university, they put all of their effort for boosting their qualification and trying for the next time. As a result, attempting for alteration has numerous advantages, namely, gaining new qualifications and new motivation. On the other hand, some believe that it is better to accept the situation. They argue that acceptence can lead to balance and a peacefull life. This is because if individuals encounter an unpleasent situation, they do not blam themselves, instead they enjoy with what they have. Thus, they feel less anxiety and self-blaming. For example, a person with a low-salary accept this income and use their free time for persuing their interest and hobbies. As a result, due to acceptence they may have a balance in their life rather than trying for change all the time. In conclusion. despite potential benefits like less anxiety and a balanced life, which comes with acceptance, I strongly belive that trying for change has many advantages including achieving success and self improvement.

Response: In several counties, moving from rural area to live in the city has become a popular trend among individuals. While this stuation can be beneficial for increasing the number of urabn workforce, in my view, the drawbacks, such as less production of specific goods, have brought more significant consequences. The rural people have become interested in leaving their homes in the countrysides to start a new life in the cities. First of all, this trend has a vital impact on the employeement. There is a significant rise in the number of fresh and strong workforce, which also can lead to increase the availability in number of jobs. For instance, a fresh started employee strive harder to impress her or his manager by presenting new ideas. Moreover, financial investments by those people are a key factor in bringing economic stability to the city. Most of the rural people sell their properties in order to develop their lives in the city. On the other hand, the mentioned factors can be viewed from different perspectives. Firstly, the increasing population in the urabn area has detrimental effects. In this way, the unemployment rates increase, due to this, the level of poverty and crime rate will rise, too. The government cannot create enough jobs, so people undergo a pressuring condition to meet their daily needs. Additionally, the countyside is adversely affected, by land being sold to the constructors who replace fields with residental areas, and also the production of local products, such as rice, will decrease significantly, if the rural people continue to migration and leave their jobs in the countrysides. As a result, I believe that these disadvantages are more critical. In conclusion, the migration of rurals to live in the city has increased dramatically in most countries. Although this situation carries certain advantages, like growing the number of workforce, in my opinion, this trend is a negative development because of its potential drawbacks, including increasing the poverty rates and destroying green lands in the countrysides.

Response: Some belive professionals should work in countries where they were educated. Others argue that they should have freedom to choose countries where they want to work .personally , I believe individuals should have freedom when they want to make decisions about the country that they want to work due to reasons I will mention in essay Individuals who argue that professionals should be needed to work in their countries believe professionals should compensate the fundings that are spent on their education. To educate professional, governments should dedicate a significant a lot of public budgets to their education. For example, engineers who master in their major are educated by public buget graduates can compensate this funding by make a positive contribution to economic growth and technological advancements. When educated individuals immigrate to other countries, government may face employees shortage, which not only slow economic growth but also reduce the quality of life for residence. Other argue that individuals should have freedom to choose where they want to live. Limiting human’s freedom is not only unethical but also can cause hostile and conflicts in society. Professional often immigrant to secure better employment opportunities and improve their quality of their life, which may not be achievable in their countries. By limiting their freedom they not only cannot be productive for countries but may also seek unauthentic ways to leave their countries, which have long-term negative effects for both countries and people. Government should provide good facilities and amenities that can encourage them to stay in their countries instead of limiting their freedom In conclusion, although immigrating professional can have lone-term negative consequence for society and government, the limitation of human presents more challenge. Therefore government should enforce regulation that incentivize professional to stay in their countries.

Response: These days, many individuals turn to use alternative medicine instead of visiting doctors. Personally, I believe it can be considered as negative development because it present several drawback like the potential of life-threatening drugs, ineffectiveness remedies. Using alternative medicine can present several drawbacks. this can be life-threatening. Individuals who work in alternative medicine sectors of are not taught formal and scientific education. They prescribe medicine that are not experimented in the labs and are also unauthentic. These prescriptions and drugs can be poisons, which non only cannot treat the patients but also worse the diseases. For example, many patients suffer from side effects of alterative drugs that make their disease more complex and untreatable. Additionally, man patients lose the suitable and gold time for curing their disease by wasting their time in alternative drugs. Serious diseases often, like cancer ,have time limitation . if people who suffered from serious disease do no follow their treatment in suitable time, they may lose the chance for treatment for ever, which not only leads to death but also can several negative mental health problem for their relatives. These remedies often involve significant financial costs. As patient are deceived by fake advertisements of alternative drugs. They spend a lot of money on these drugs that no only do not have any positive feedback but also can place financial pressure on them In conclusion, I believe using alternative medicine can be quite negative development because this present drawbacks like life threating consequences, costly drugs. Patients should avoid using alternative medicine and prioritize traditional medicine.