IELTS Writing Samples

Response: A group of individuals present the view that they should learn about other subjects in addition to their main major, whereas others believe that it is more important to focus on their study and allocate all of their time and attention to receive a qualification. I strongly agree with the former opinion. On the one hand, a group of people justifiably argue that they should know about other extra subject. This group mention that they should gain some extra knowledge about other field, while they study in a different major. For instance, while an individual study engineering, they might be passion about art and music. They believe that they have to pay attention to both fields as they are able to use one of them for earning money and use another one to calm themselves in their difficult situations. These kinds of individuals like to do numerous tasks at a time and are able to handle them meanwhile finishing them with success. On the other hand, another group of people claim that they should spend all of their time on their main field and just broaden their knowledge in that specific subject. They insist that should they learn another skill or learn about other subjects, they will distract from their main purpose. They believe it would be better for them to finish their study at first and after that they learn new skills. While, this will lead to success in one major, but they forget that they have a limited time in the world. However, I do not find all of these reasons convincing as they can use their waste time such as the time which they spend on social media or their commuting time on learning a new skill that they want. To conclude, in my opinion students should learn about different subjects except their main field because they can turn to a multitask person and be successful in many aspect of their life. Moreover, as people are able to use their waste time to gain new knowledge, no excuse is acceptable.

Response: It is an indisputable fact that owning or renting houses has become a pressing issue in today’s society, sparking widespread debate among individuals and governments, and people have differing opinions about this matter. This essay will examine both perspectives and explain why I strongly believe that having a rented house has numerous disadvantages. Therefore, owning your own home would be the best solution. The debate over whether owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people is beneficial or detrimental is far from settled, as compelling evidence exists to support both perspectives. Many people hold the view that being a house owner is extremely important. While others argue that it depends on the household. The main reason why people are against renting houses is that if you buy the house you live in, you do not have to worry about moving anymore. Also, it is indeed considered as a long-term investment. Being a house owner means that one can design their home the way they can imagine. Therefore, you will have fewer concern about paying rent. Advocates of the rental, argue that it also provides numerous benefits, such as moving out once in a while, which gives you the sense of diversity in your daily life. Therefore, if an individual is a diversity-seeking human, this life style would provide numerous benefits for them. This clearly demonstrates that the merit is only beneficial for the certain group. On the other hand, many believes spending money on a residence is considered as a waste of money, since the price for villa and cottages are extremely high and only the wealthy group could possibly afford it. To conclude, both views have their own merits. From a broader perspective, it becomes evident that the advantages of having your own house far outweigh its drawbacks. Taking all factors into account, it is evident that this point of view remains the most viable solution in the long run.

Response: It is believed that, improving the quality of life should be considered as the priority of science. I contend that, while mainly this statement is justifiable, to some extent, all progress in science should not necessarily take place to favor people's lives. On the one hand, scientific progress could initially follow different aspects. Regardless of its goal for human's comfort, science could definitely follow other aspects such as merely satisfying researcher's curiosity about unknown. Many of research and explorations in different fields of science are being conducted in order to obtaining more information about things which are not completely discovered. One of the brilliant examples of this, is many space explorations which have not had any significant impact on the quality of life. These explorations are primarily done to acquire more in-depth insight on things that humans have not had much material about. However, noteworthy is that they may not have any intentional goal to affect life on earth, but several of them are beneficial indirectly; take the satellites for instance, which are a relief for anticipating weather. Hence, I believe that, most of scientific projects and developments should be initially conducted with the aim of bringing comfort for human-beings. The reasons are twofold. First of all, making effort to bring sustainability to society will ultimately benefits science in return. With a society which does not have any struggle for maintaining the stability and everything have been prepared for a good quality of life, governments are able to put more focus and attention for scientific developments. Further, it is a necessity to eliminate problems which are exist in world which sometimes pose a risk for human existence. From the past up to now, scientists have attempted to eliminate difficulties in communities so that people enjoy the better quality of life. For example, all of researchers who have made effort in history to find cure for ailments that were risks for human life. In conclusion, while it might seem that not all progress in science are in favour of humans ,I believe , their ultimate goal is to bring comfort to us.

Response: In recent years, the daily time that children use their smartphones has increased significantly which leads to several concerns regarding its effects on their well-being. Although some people believe that this is a part of human development which can provide children access to the latest information and technologies, others argue that it can affect their physical and mental health. This essay will examine the advantages and disadvantages of this global trend and argue why its negative effects outweigh the benefits. Accessing smart devices like new generations of cell phones, can be extremely beneficial. They can not only connect people by transferring their voice and video but also can integrate many applications into one single device. For instance, they can share the children's precise locations with their parents to ensure they are safe and well. In addition, smartphones can assist students in accessing multimedia learning materials which can be accessible anytime and anywhere. These features can provide better opportunities for educational advancement and growth. In contrast, spending extended time using a mobile device encourages a sedentary lifestyle for children. For instance, It might lead to eye strains, obesity, or posture issues for them. In addition, it might cause mental problems as well and make them unable to concentrate on their study at school. In conclusion, while technological advancement can make the world a better place to live and grow for everyone including youngsters, we should be aware of its downsides, especially for minors. Therefore, I strongly believe that using these devices should be strictly limited and controlled by people who are responsible for children.

Response: In today's world, the tendency to migrate overseas has increased significantly among individuals. Although some feel that professionals should be kept in their home countries so as not to cause shortage, I completely agree with those who believe all people should be free to choose their work environment. On the one hand, it could be argued that a substantial amount of money has been dedicated to train experts by governments. The more doctors and engineers leave their own countries, the more job vacancies may be created, enforcing authorities to employ some foreign professionals as alternatives. This cycle can impose a financial burden on societies, leading to a economic crisis. Additionally, it is said that people may lose the sense of commitment to their own country when migrate abroad. To elaborate, national identity is undeniably important to both countries and individuals, making them known globally. When professionals migrate to other countries permanently, they may be influenced by the culture of their destination countries and forget about their traditions. On the other hand, experiencing a sense of freedom is a crucial human right. If professionals had been forced to work in their birth countries, the chances would be high that they feel deprived of freedom. These feelings cam discourage them to perform better in their workplaces, leading to a sharp decrease in expected outcomes. Moreover, individuals like to have the opportunity to expand their knowledge by migrating to different countries. It is obvious that some privileged countries such as developed nations have far better facilities to offer. Take the USA as an example; this wealth country has been offered lots of opportunities to all individuals to hone their skills, making people keen to migrate there to benefit from these chances. To sum up, although I acknowledge that professionals' migration can cause some difficulties like financial crises, I wholeheartedly believe that they should be allowed to choose their country freely.

Response: In recent years, argues revolving around financial issues have become more controversial. It is now newly believe that all individuals from all of the group ages should save money for their future. I find myself among those who fully subscribe this statement due to some rational reasons. Financial literacy should be internalize in children from very early ages in kindergartens and schools. Money-saving is considered to be among these crucial meanings that are requiered to be taught. In this way, children completely comprehend if they save money, they will reach their desired goals much easily. As a result, people might save money for their future goals and targets they endeavour to achieve. Trying to spend less and aiming to save for buying a house or a car, go on a trip or some personal staff, for instance, reminds individuals to stick to their dreams although it may be tough. Moreover, there is always a probability for some unexpected events which cannot be prevented. Fires, earthquakes, car accidents or even robberies are among these accidents that are out of our control and may lead to financial losses. Thus, it is logicaly acceptable to save some money for these catastrophies. Therefore, this foresightedness is needed as there is no guarantee for what will happen in the future. This saving money can also contribute to limiting the extra expenses that only impose additional costs on the budget. So, people compel to prohibit themselves from allocating a huge amount of money to purchasing a piece of equipment which they are aware will remain useless. To recapitulate what has been discussed above, from my standpoint it is completely reasonable to accept all of the people should save money from the present since some unexpected accidents which impose considerable losses cannot be prevented. Moreover, this attitude learns both youngsters and elderly to avoid wasting money to reach their achievements.

Response: In today’s digital world, a wide range of ways to compete with others have emerged. Whereas many people push themselves in competition with other people in all aspects of life, many still drive pleasure from cooperating with other people, rather than fighting against each other. Although both believes are true and have their own benefits, I would like to lean toward the former. For the majority of the society cooperation in everyday life can be an extremely positive experience. Working together allows individuals to have the opportunity to communicate and gain new information from others. A good example is that, companies that divide employees in groups to handle projects together could have better results since people in the group help each other to solve the problems even if it is not their responsibility to have the best outcome, they will put so much efford to finish the project. Competition is an efficient way to improve the quality of life. Individuals can try harder and increase their knowledge after compering themselves with others in community. Comparison encourage people to trust themselves, set goals and try to reach it.Olympic games are a good example of competition among human which arise unbelievable talents between trainers with some recorded in gines book. In conclusion, even though some would rather cooperation with others in society due to enjoying themselves working and communicating with others, I would rather to compete myself with others in so many aspects of life in light of being more hardworking in each part of life, as well as more creative.

Response: These days there is a contentious discussion on the subject of preserving endangered species. While the first group argues that the extinction of any flora and fauna has the huge devastating impact on our planet, the others argue that there are more significant environmental issues that should be considered as our priority. In this essay, I intend to discuss both viewpoints, and in my perspective, the former group’s mindset is more acceptable. On the one hand, the latter group justify the idea that extinction of specific species is not the biggest environmental concern in our modern world. They convey that, pollution resulted from urbanisation is considered as the principal environmental complication. Nowadays by developing industrialization, humans are putting a major strain on the nature. Many repercussions such as acid rain, global warming, greenhouse gasses are driven from human activities which are influencing the nature negatively which are more considerably have a negative consequences on Earth. Yet, the other group, including myself, believes that the disappearance of plants and animals is the most concerning problem which should be our priority because of two main reasons. At the heart of the matter is the imbalance of the ecosystem obtained from extinction. When a particular species is removed from the nature, it makes some alternation to the food chain. As it is considered the prey of other species and other animals in that habitat, rely on them for their survival, this disappearance put the other creatures at risk. More importantly, it has an impact on human’s life directly or indirectly. Humans consume many of these species as a source of their food, therefore, when one of them is become extinct, our survival as a part of this chain is on threat. In conclusion, environmental issues nowadays are numerous and while some people say that the other environmental problems like global warming is so considerable, I contend that the matter of extinction is the most environmental concern.

Response: In the future, all cars, buses, and trucks will be driverless. The only people traveling inside these vehicles will be passengers. Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages? Today's transportation without drivers is a global matter. In the future, a veriety of vehicles are going to travel using technology and they will be driverless, which only travelers present. In my perspective, drawbacks of this progress outweigh benefits due to the rate of increasing unemployment and restriction of human accessibility. According to the advantages, there are several negative points of this development. One of the significant issues is the accelerating proportion of unemployment. For more transparency, drivers constitute one of the largest classifications in society. According to the surveys, they are unskilled for doing other jobs like being unable to work with technology and computer or lacking academic education for finding jobs in offices. As a result, they will loss their job due to travelling without any drivers, which have several negative effects on their personal lives such as having no money for renting houses and buying food. Moreover, reliance on technology sacrifices the use of human intelligence. This improvement restricts human from using their ability to change a wrong plan to a better plan. Some times sudden terrible events happen easily with using driverless automobiles, which are only controlled by human creativity. For example, not only drivers get familliar with unexpected barriers on the roads and can pass over them well, but also know how to control the car. On the other hand, it will make thigs more comfortable and decrease some mistakes. This progress uses Artificial Intelligence like the majority of works that these days are done. The AI is active and smart. So, it is not the human mistakes. As a result it will be safer than humans. For instance, humans become tired and sleepy during long journey, thus, the risk of sudden accidents increases. To sum up, there are some advantages and disadvantages for becoming automation and driver removal. I do not completely agree and I think the negative points are more significant than the benefits. Unemployment and the limitation of human intelligence are outcomes of that.

Response: Some individuals claim that all people, including the youth, should set aside money for their coming years. I completely agree with this viewpoint for three main reasons, including preparing for unforeseen challenges. There is no question that there are a lot of challenges which can occur in individuals' lives, needing considerable sums of money to be overcome. Take transplants as an obvious example; if people encounter organ failures, such as lung, heart, or kidney failure, they should pay a significant amount of money to modern medical centers for surgery. Possessing adequate money for establishing a business is another area of concern. I strongly believe that individuals, especially young people, should save money for their future when they want to launch their own business. Some people argue that youngsters should enjoy their lives and live in the moment, so saving money is not a necessary for them. However, I firmly believe that establishing a business requires a great deal of money, so people should set aside money for some years to afford this expense. Having a business plays an important role in people's lives, providing them with the opportunity to earn adequate money to meet their needs. Finally, the most significant reason for saving money is preparing for retirement. Unquestionably, a large number of individuals will face this phase of life in the coming years when they will no longer be able to work and earn money. Therefore, people should set aside an adequate amount of money for their retirement, providing themselves with the ability to meet their needs. In conclusion, it is my firm belief that individuals, specifically young people, should set aside money for their future. This activity provides them with the opportunity to overcome challenges and establish their own businesses.