IELTS Writing Samples

Showing samples for all topics

The Importance of Saving Money for the Future

IELTS Writing Task 2

-
Complete
7.0
Response: Some individuals claim that all people, including the youth, should set aside money for their coming years. I completely agree with this viewpoint for some reasons, including preparing for unforeseen challenges. There is no question that, there are a lot of challenges which can occur in individuals' lives, needing considerable sums of money to be overcome. Take transplants as an obvious example; if people encounter organ failures, such as lung, heart, or kidney failure, they should pay a significant amount of money to modern medical centers for surgery. Possessing adequate money for establishing business is another area of concern. I strongly believe that individuals, especially young people, should save money for their future when they want to launch their own business. Some people argue that youngsters should enjoy their lives and live in the moment, so saving money is not a necessary for them. However, I firmly believe that establishing a business requires a great deal of money, so people should set aside money for some years to can afford this expense. Having a business play an important role in people's lives, as provides them with the opportunity to earn adequate money to meet their needs. Finally, the most significant reason for saving money is preparing for retirement. Unquestionably, a large number of individuals will face this phase of live in the coming years when they no longer be able to work and earn money. Therefore, people should set aside an adequate amount of money for their retirement, providing themselves with the ability to meet their needs. In conclusion, it is my firm belief that individuals specifically young people should set aside money for their future. This activity provides them with the opportunity to overcome challenges and establish their own businesses.

Driverless Vehicles: Advantages and Disadvantages

IELTS Writing Task 2

-
Complete
4.5
Response: Today's transportion without drivers is global matter. In the future, vatiety of vehivles are going to travel with using technology and thy will be driverless, which only travellers are peresent. In my prospective, drawbacks of these progress outweight benefits due to rate of becoming unemployment and restriction of human accessibility. According to advantages, there are several negative point of this development. One of the significant issue is accelerating a proportion of unemployment. For more transparency, drivers costitute one of the largest classifications in society. According to survays, they are unskilled for doing other jobs like unable to working with technology and cumputer or lack of academic education for finding job in offices. As a result, they will loss their job due to travelling without any drivers, which have several negative effect on their personal lives such as no money for renting house and buying food. Moreover, rely on technology sacrifises using human intelligence. This improvement restrict human to use their ability to change wrong plan to better plan. Some times sudden terrible events happen easily with using driveless automobiles, which just controll with human creativity. For example, not only drivers get familliar with unexpected barriers in the roads and they can pass over them well,but also they know how to control the car. On the another hand, it will make comfortable and decrease some mistakes. This progress uses Artificial Intelligence like the majority works that thesedays are done. the AI is active and smart. So, it is not the human mistakes. As a result it will be safer than human. For instance, human become tired and sleepy with long journey, thus, the risk of sudden accident increase. To sum up, there are some advantages and disadvantages for becoming automation and driver removal. I do not completely agree and i soppose the negative points are more than the benefits. Unemployment and limitation of human intelligence are outcomes of that.

Balancing Main and Additional Subjects in University Education

IELTS Writing Task 2

-
Complete
7.5
Response: Some students do not agree with restricting their studies to their main subject and want to earn new attitudes about other branches as well. However, some believe this can reduce the practicality of the main studies. I strongly suggest extending knowledge for everyone regardless of their major. The human mind is capable of handling a massive amount of information; therefore, it would not be fair to limit the abilities of brain to a particular area of science and overlook the other subjects. In other words, a student can enhance their knowledge and capability by diversifying their range of concerns. It is worth noting that, working in various domains of science can beneficially broaden perspective in students' own major, which could be their advantage among peers. For instance, if a engineering student strengthens their language skills by learning a new language, it can give them an opportunity to access to foreign sources of engineering, and facilitate their studies. On the other hand, concentrating on a particular objective, that is students' main subject in university, is more likely to result in desirable outcomes. To elaborate, when one tries to coordinate different tasks simultaneously, they have to divide their energy, rather than focusing on a certain field; because of that, each objective might lose its quality. Furthermore, students must manage the amount of engagement with the peripheral subjects; Otherwise, they might stray from their own lessons, the result of which brings regret. To illustrate, if a medical student gets interested in psychology, they must dedicate a logical amount of time for studying it, unless they would not prefer becoming a successful doctor. In conclusion, in conjuction with a proper administration, expanding knowledge in other subjects can be advantageous for university students. However, there is potential of loss in caliber of main subject.

Balancing Main and Additional Subjects in University Education

IELTS Writing Task 2

-
Complete
6.5
Response: Some students do not agree with restricting their studies to their main subject and want to attain attitudes about other branchs as well. However, some believe this can reduce the practicality of the main studies. I strongly suggest extending knowledge for everyone regardless of their major. Human mind is capable of handling a massive amount of information; therefore, it would not be fair to limit the abilities of brain to a particular area of science and overlook other subjects. In other words, a student can enhance their knowledge and capability by diversifying their range of concerns. It is worth noting that, working in various domains of science can give beneficially broaden the perspective in students' own major, which could be their advantage among peers. For instance, if a engineering student strengthens their language skills by learning a new language, it can give them an opportunity to access to foreign sources of engineering and facilitate their studies. Nonetheless, concentrating on a particular objective, that is students' main subject in university, is more likely to result in desirable outcomes. To elaborate, when one tries to coordinate different tasks simultaneously, they have to divide their energy, rather than focucing on a certain field; thus, each objective might lose its quality. Furthermore, students must manage the amount of engagment with the peripheral subjects, other wise they might stray from their own lessons, the result of which brings regret. To illustrate, if a medical student gets intrested in psychology, they must dedicate a logical time for studying it, unless they would not prefer becoming a successful doctor. In conclusion, in conjuction with a proper administration, expanding knowledge in other subjects can be advantageous for university students.

The Main Environmental Problem: Species Loss vs. Other Issues

IELTS Writing Task 2

-
Complete
7.5
Response: In today’s world, environmental issues have become a significant debate among citizens. There are two conflicting views, while some individuals opine that the main problem is related to the extinction of particular flora and fauna, others including myself hold the view that other issues such as deforestation and air pollution are more detrimental. Supporters of particular plants and animals believe that the loss of every species can seriously impact the entire food chain. For example, the extinction of bees due to destroying their habitat and pesticides that humans use, have a direct connection to pollination. Moreover, it is argued that biodiversity plays a crucial role in life-saving medicine such as cancer and antibiotics, as a result, if animals and plants are extinct, humans may not be able to conduct further research. Regarding the second perspective, they posit that the ecosystem suffers from several problems including deforestation, air pollution, and climate change. Deforestation is the main issue as trees can absorb carbon dioxide. What makes an approach positive is the fact that reduces air pollution and makes fresh air for humans. Research reveals that millions of trees are cut down in order to create either paper or construction buildings. This course of action has a considerable effect not only on the extinction of biodiversity but also on climate change. It seems logical to accept that whereas losing some flora and fauna can be serious it is closely linked to other environmental challenges.it is vital to consider to root of problems and try to tackle them. Addressing main issues such as deforestation and air pollution should be our top priority, solving these issues will prevent specious extinction. In conclusion, however, biodiversity has an essential role in the ecosystem and overall human lives, but other environmental problems are more important. If individuals focus on tackling these issues, they can prevent endangered species.

Impact of Smartphone Usage on Children

IELTS Writing Task 2

-
Complete
6.5
Response: In the digital age, threre is an arising concern about young adults spending several hours daily with mobile phone obssessively. In my opinion, there are a couple of reasons contributing to this issue and my belief is that it is a detrimental trend overall as it has numerous negative effects on children. With regard to the potential reasons why youth nowaday are so engaged with technology specificaly their smart phones, I think the most significant reason would be their appealing characteristics. Youngsters regard this technology as a versatile object which they can do whatever they want. With phones they are able to do variety of activities such as play games, contact with friends from all over the world, establish new friendships online and even exploit it for their educational aspects. All of which, thus, make it completely functinal and amusing device for people to use. Concernig it's effects,however, I imply that it could negatively harm teenagers in many ways. First and foremost, it restricts the social interactions. Teenagers nowadays do not eager to socialize with others and enhance their social skills since they are being so involved with virtual world of social media and feel no intention to make connection in person and this is affecting their real interaction with people. Lack of the ability to connect with others in real life consequently leads them to isolation which is so harmful. Additionally, it also results in less physical activity. Spending too much hours sitting and working with phones leaves no time for teenagers to be physically active and that leads to several health problems in their future such as obesity. In conclusion, I think the issue of children involving with technology is a pressing problem which has devastating impacts upon youth and there are a number of reasons relating to it such as compelling features of technology.

The Influence of Advertising on Consumer Behavior

IELTS Writing Task 2

-
Complete
7.0
Response: In the present climate, the ability of advertisements to attract the attention of people has sparked an immense amount of heated debate. There are two perspectives concerning this matter. One of these views claim that advertisements can convince individuals to purchase things. Another point of view, however, argues advertising is no longer successful at making the public buy products. I, for one, subscribe to the former opinion. Those who opine that advertisements do not have any effect on people may provide several justifications. Firstly, they refer to the business programs televised in the middle of TV series. Viewers usually turn the TV volume down as soon as these programs are shown. This can prove the general public do not pay attention to them. Furthermore, a tiny minority of citizens might heed posters and billboards in the streets and high ways. The reason may be the fact that the number of these posters has been on the rise in the recent years, so individuals may be used to them. On the other hand, some people argue that advertising is still effective. A number of advertisements may be so appealing and attractive that citizens are markedly tempted to buy certain goods. In other words, even if one does not require a product, they might decide to purchase it. This has been shown by a study at the University of California. More than 50,000 people from various countries were interviewed and asked with regard to their attention to advertisements. Over 67 percent of attendees said that they have had an experience of buying goods that they did not really need and were just tempted by advertisement. What can be concluded from the above is that I believe advertising can be still workable in terms of persuading people to shop for different bargains since plenty of them might be significantly tempting. This has been proven by a research project conducted at an American university.

The Impact of Encouraging Children to Achieve Their Dreams

IELTS Writing Task 2

-
Complete
7.0
Response: In the present climate, trying to accomplish achievements in life has immensely sparked a heated debate. Kids, in some nations, are frequently told that they are able to achieve anything they desire if they try hard. This claim potentially have benefits and drawbacks. I, for one, believe that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. If parents tell their offspring that they can be successful if they just try, this can lead to several problems. Firstly, it may not be reasonable that just perseverance is considered if a child wants to be prosperous. A considerable number of jobs and tasks require special factors and trying hard is not enough. By way of illustration, an individual who intends to become a painter should consider whether they are talented or have particular abilities, such as being creative. As axiomatic as it may sound, without the mentioned qualities, a child is not able to become a professional in a career. This, in turn, might result in many negative consequences. For example, children may feel frustrated or depressed after trying hard and not reaching their goals. On the other hand, provided that the young are told that they are able to accomplish anything by determination and perseverance, this can be beneficial in several respects. It cannot be overlooked that a significant number of accomplishments can be achieved if a person try really hard. For instance, a student who desires to gain admission into a favorable institute of higher education may reach their goal through studying hard. This might be true of one who seeks a rewarding job with a decent salary. Consequently, this message can serve as a motivator for children and they are able to ensure that they may satisfy their dreams by trying hard. In conclusion, I opine that this message that children can reach their goals by being determined might have more benefits than drawbacks. The advantages include the fact that trying can become a motivational factor for children and the drawback is that not everything is achieved by trying.

The Future of Printed Media

IELTS Writing Task 2

-
Complete
6.5
Response: In the present climate, alterations in the form of publications have sparked an immense amount of heated debate. There is a claim that in the following years, paper books have become obsolete and nobody will purchase them since these books are available on the Internet. I, for one, do not subscribe to this standpoint. There exist several justifications why printed publications are possibly on the market in the future. Firstly, it cannot be overlooked that not everyone is comfortable with reading materials online. Many are used to studying paper magazines. They study their lessons on paper from school to the institutes of further education, so they will probably prioritize buying printed books over reading them on a website. Furthermore, it has been scientifically proven that spending too much time on screens can lead to eye strain and other health-related problems. According to a research project conducted at the University of California, over 67 percent of graduates who studied for their exams online complained about not observing their environment clearly. This is not comparable with a mosest 5 percent of those who studied paper books. What is more, websites and blogs usually charge their users and are not free. In other words, people may have to subscribe to online channels by paying a particular amount of subscription. By way of illustration, a popular mobile application named Citera has provided the public with current events. It posts latest pieces of news immediately after they occur. The drawback, however, is that it receive a significant deal of money to give this beneficial service. What can be concluded from the above is that I do not accede to the view that printed materials will become out of date and no one shops for them. There might be numerous reasons, including reading newspapers on screens of computers may not be the preference of users. Another rationale is that these screens can considerably hurt our eyes and ultimately, the majority of online websites may not be freely usable.

The Importance of Home Ownership

IELTS Writing Task 2

-
Complete
7.0
Response: In the present climate, accommodation has sparked an immense amount of heated debate. It has been claimed that people in some nations are more inclined to buy a house instead of renting it. I believe this matter can have many reasons, such as the high expenses of renting and the challenges of moving. In my perspective, this may be a positive development. There exist several justifications why individuals tend to owe a home. Firstly, the prices of renting are so high that tenants may have to spend the overwhelming majority of their income on paying renting. Take Iran, for instance. Due to the high rates of inflation and other economic problems, tenants are obliged to dedicate a considerable proportion of their salary to renting. What is more, when renting a house, residents may have to move out of the home after a particular time. As axiomatic as it may sound, the period of renting is set in a contract, so when this time finishes, tenants must move into another house. Concerning the created condition, it can be beneficial. One of the most important reasons may be the fact that purchasing a home can be a strong motivation to save up money. Individuals may make every single effort to earn more money by, for example, working overtime. Although this subject may seem hard and challenging in the first few years, it can benefit the public in the long run. While owing their accommodation, people are not forced to pay landlords. Furthermore, they are able to reside in their houses as long as they desire. What can be concluded from the above is that I argue it might be a positive circumstance that citizens prefer to have a house rather than renting it since one is motivated to be more active and work more hours to be able to afford to purchase a home.
1
...
5
6
7
...
62