The essay addresses the prompt by discussing both views on whether university students should focus solely on their main subjects or explore additional subjects. The writer clearly states their opinion, supporting the idea of learning about other subjects. However, the essay could benefit from more specific examples and evidence to strengthen the arguments presented. For instance, providing data or studies that show the benefits of a multidisciplinary approach could enhance the argument.
The essay is generally well-organized, with a clear introduction, body paragraphs discussing each viewpoint, and a conclusion. However, the transitions between ideas could be smoother. For example, the transition from discussing the benefits of learning additional subjects to the drawbacks of focusing solely on one subject could be more fluid. Using linking words and phrases such as "furthermore," "in contrast," or "on the contrary" could improve the flow of the essay.
The vocabulary used in the essay is appropriate, but there is room for improvement in terms of variety and precision. Phrases like "extra subject" and "waste time" could be replaced with more academic terms such as "supplementary disciplines" and "leisure time." Additionally, the essay could benefit from more varied sentence structures to demonstrate a wider range of language use.
The essay contains several grammatical errors that could be addressed to improve clarity and readability. For example, "while an individual study engineering" should be "while an individual studies engineering," and "they might be passion about art" should be "they might be passionate about art." Additionally, some sentences are awkwardly constructed, such as "These kinds of individuals like to do numerous tasks at a time and are able to handle them meanwhile finishing them with success." Simplifying and restructuring these sentences would enhance comprehension.
By addressing these areas, the essay can be improved to better meet the IELTS writing criteria.