IELTS Writing Samples

Response: In contemporary society, consumers in some countries have access to food produced all over the world by visiting supermarkets. I contend that this is a positive development due to some reasons that I will mention in this essay. To begin with, one reason that having access to food produced globally is a positive development is that it can decrease the price of certain products. When governments export their goods to other countries, it increases the diversity of food available among countries, leading to competition among producers. This competition not only drives down prices of products but also encourages producers to improve the quality of their products. Moreover, another positive aspect is that if consumers are able to buy an array of food products, they will be more likely to become familiar with culture of other nations, consumers may encounter foods from different countries, prompting them to research these items through the internet for more information. Since the cuisine of various countries often reflects their traditions and heritage, this research can enhance their understanding of different cultures. For example, spaghetti, which originate from Italy, is now found all over the world, and encouraging consumers to learn more about its history and cultural significance. In conclusion, the ability to buy food produced all over the world is a positive development due to its potential to provide consumers with affordable options and to foster an appreciation for diverse customs. This exposure not only leads to the discovery of new cuisines but also enhances a sense of belonging and cultural understanding.

Response: These days in many countries all around the world, people have access to foods and other products that are manufactured in other countries. I firmly believe this is a negative development that can affect both our environment and local economies. In this essay, I will express my opinion and support it by providing explanation and relevant examples. First of all, these products have to travel long distances to reach their destinations either by cargo ships or airplanes. For example, a company like Nestle produces most of its products in European countries like Germany and Austria, before distributing them all around the world. These long journeys result in devastating environmental consequences by contributing to carbon emission and global warming. As a result, those products that have been manufactured abroad has a higher carbon footprint compared to locally produced foods. In addition, importing food from other countries can hurt local economy by creating an unjust competition between international corporations and locally owned businesses. Those big companies, such as Coca-Cola, may use strategies such as price dumping to take control of the market and put domestic businesses out of competition. However, small domestic companies don’t have the necessary resources to compete in this scenario, and will end up filing for bankruptcy. In conclusion, buying products manufactured abroad not only affects local economies by putting small domestic businesses out of competition, but also have a significant effect on our planet and global warming by contributing to carbon emission. In my opinion, it is better if people support domestic businesses by purchasing locally produced foods and other products.

Response: Purchasing foreign food products is currently possible for supermarkets costumers in numerous countries. Local consumers and economy benefit greatly from broader range of choices and more opportunities, respectively. However, in my opinion, the damage to production sector of the economy and capital outflow are irreparable. A product manufactured in the United States may appear on supermarket shelves in China, Japan or various European countries. This development has provided customers with a diverse array of options, enabling them to select products that more precisely align with their preferences. For example, the diabetic community in the United States would opt for food products with lower, or no sugar content. American manufacturers might introduce them a beverage with higher level of sugar, while their European counterparts, using different formulas, might offer drinks with lower or no artificial sweeteners to cater their needs. Furthermore, selling products abroad typically creates a mutually beneficial situation for companies and destination countries. To remain competitive in the market, companies must lower the final prices of their products. Strategies such as circumventing transportation costs by constructing food production facilities in the host country and employing local workforces are often adopted to effectively serve this purpose. This not only creates more job opportunities, but also attracts more foreign capital. Importing, on the other hand, can adversely affect the manufacturing sector. A market inundated with foreign goods might constrain the prospects for domestic production. A constant producing-sales cycle ensures sustainable economic growth in the production sector. This fragile cycle could simply be interrupted by the import of foreign-manufactured goods offered to consumers at reduced prices, exerting pressure on domestic producers, which ultimately leads to the contraction of the production sector. Cutting-edge technologies implemented in developed countries yet exacerbate the issue for underdeveloped or developing nations, where the production costs exceed those of imported items. This trend increases capital outflow as merchants are urged to import more foreign food products. Valuable foreign currencies, such as US dollars or Euros, which should be allocated to a country’s infrastructure development or be invested in vital industries, education, or public health, are extravagantly spent on importing food items that could be produced domestically. Therefore, if imports are unchecked, they harm local manufacturing and divert crucial financial resources from essential sectors, stifling economic growth and development. In conclusion, while importing foreign food products offers consumer variety and economic opportunities, it significantly harms local manufacturing and diverts crucial financial resources, stifling economic growth and development. Balancing imports with domestic industry protection is essential for sustainable growth.

Response: It is claimed that processed portions are ubiquitous in supermarkets internationally. While I accept that these meals may bring some positive sides, they are mainly negative. On the one hand, produced food can tackle the problem of hectic lifestyles. As individuals dealing with a busy schedule nowadays in terms of business or study, a convenient approach to food is of paramount importance. In fact, processed food might be considered a time-saving solution regarding people's daily rush. Above that, large scale produced portions can provide various choices for all consumers. For example, meat-free products of all types are widely accessible for vegetarians so that they would be able to choose any desirable food. On the other hand, processed food which can be sold in supermarkets bring many health issues and provokes laziness. Firstly, with food being widely accessible in supermarkets, people would lose their eagerness to cook for their own. If individuals do not understand the necessity of physical activities like making portions for their family, they will follow a sedentary lifestyle. Secondly, these portions have numerous drawbacks regarding their health standards so that overusing them would lead to many physical disorders like obesity. Produced food mainly consist extra fat, sugar and saturated salt which are detrimental for human body. For example, an average intake of harmful fat from produced hamburgers is twice as much as home made one. In conclusion, although the variety of food in supermarkets present some usefulness due to their convenience, they would have negative effects on people's health and promotes sedentary lifestyle.

Response: It is claimed that processed portions are ubiquitous in supermarkets internationally. While I accept that these meals may bring some positive sides, they are mainly negative. On the one hand, produced food can tackle the problem of hectic lifestyles. As individuals dealing with a busy schedule nowadays in terms of business or study, a convenient approach to food is of paramount importance. In fact, processed food might be considered a time-saving solution regarding people's daily rush. Above that, large scale produced portions can provide various choices for all consumers. For example, meat-free products of all types are widely accessible for vegetarians so that they would be able to choose any desirable food. On the other hand, processed food which can be sold in supermarkets bring many health issues and provokes laziness. Firstly, with food being widely accessible in supermarkets, people would lose their eagerness to cook for their own. If individuals do not understand the necessity of physical activities like making portions for their family, they will follow a sedentary lifestyle. Secondly, these portions have numerous drawbacks regarding their health standards so that overusing them would lead to many physical disorders like obesity. Produced food mainly consist extra fat, sugar and saturated salt which are detrimental for human body. For example, an average intake of harmful fat from produced hamburgers is twice as much as home made one. In conclusion, although the variety of food in supermarkets present some usefulness due to their convenience, they would have negative effects on people's health and promotes sedentary lifestyle.

Response: At the present time, customers living in many countries can go to stores in order to provide their food since it offers goods from all parts of the world. I think this development is completely positive for both food producers and customers, which will be discussed in the following essay. When foods from different places are sold in supermarkets, consumers access varied foods. When customers find foods manufactured in different places accessible, they have the chance to become familiar with different goods all over the world, so they have many options for supplying food for their families. In other words, if there were no specific shops for purchasing a varied range of foods, people would not be able to taste international foods. For instance, supermarkets have given the chance to people to taste Dutch Cheese, which is popular among many people all over the world. Thus, supermarkets have important roles for promotion of international cuisines. Furthermore, producers of foods can make more money if their products are sold in supermarkets. When individuals who live in different countries have access to supermarkets which offer foods from different nations, it is probable for these communities to increase their income. This is because when their foods are internationally purchased, the quantity of their orders increases, so more products of different countries will be bought, which leads to an increase in their income. For example, Indian Rice, which is manufactured hugely, is exported to different countries, including Iran and Afghanistan, in order to be sold in supermarkets in these countries. As a consequence, more Indian farmers can make profits. Hence, supermarkets help food manufacturer supplement their income. In conclusion, these days, foods produced from different areas of the world have become accessible in supermarkets. My firm conviction is this trend is beneficial to both customers and manufacturers of foods because the former group faces more diverse range of choices in foods, and the later group has the chance to increase their profits.

Response: There is a truth that, in today's world people in all over the world have easy and instant access to purchase various types of food. In my opinion, although this trend can be highly beneficial for people, it also has its drawbacks. There are some reasons why easily access to food productions has benefits.Firstly, it offers greater variety and choices for consumers, which are able to purchase a broader range of products from different cultures and cuisines. Secondly, foods that are seasonal in one part of the world can be available through the other parts of world due to globalization and improvements in transportation. For example, in Iran date is a food which grow in warm locations in the southest part of this country, although it is easily accessable for north part of Iran. Moreover, exporting foods especially certain rare crops can have benefits via providing income, jobs, and in economic. Finally, with a larger selection of imported foods, prices may drop as a result of competotion between companies, which is profitable for people. Some people may think it has some demerits. For instance, shipping food globally can leads to a larger carbon footprint due to transportation, which contribute to climate change. Additionally, easy access to foreign food may decrease interest in traditional, local foods, and impact on cultural heritage. Furthermore, dependency on international food sources could make countries vulnerable, if global chains are destroyed, as seen during pandemics. In conclusion, nawadays people have easy access to foods, which in my opinion its positive effects is weight than negative effects.

Response: Nowadays, access to international foods and fruits from supermarkets and shopping malls has become more prevalence. I believe it can bring several benefits to locals and tourists. One of the advantages of this global food access is that locals can consume their desirable agricultural products that originally have not been cultivated in their country. For instance, when I worked out in a gym and went for a diet, Avacado was one of my main fruits in my diet regimen. Not only does this fruit have less Callories among others but it also boosts stamina and prevents muscle weakness during endurance exercices. Unfortunately, Avocado is not a local fruit in Iran. However, I could easily purchase it from a nearby supermarket, as it is imported from countries with tropical climates. Therefore, locals can enjoy accessing to international foods and fruits that are not usually cooked or grow in their country. Moreover, the more international foods are available in a country, the more convenient would be for tourists. Establishing numerous international restauants in tourist hotspots ensure that people with different tastes can be attracted to the area, increasing tourist influx and bring economic and financial benefits to the host's government. Furthermore, this can improve cultural exchange and connects people globally, familiarizing them with different nations' cuisines and traditional dishes. For instance, a new turkish restaurant has been developed in our city, teaming with customers who saught after turkish dishes, such as Burok. Even, some people have been encouraged to find the receipes and learn how to cook them. Thus, as international foods get more available in a country, not only can captivate tourists to the area but also different foods of countries can assimilate into the local cultures, making people socially and emotionally closer. In conclusion, I believe it is beneficial to have access to international food products from supermarkets and restaurants, as it can have essential advantages for both locals and tourists. Locals can taste the agricultural products that is not harvested in their own country and enjoy their tastes and reap their health benefits. Furthermore, it can lead in more tourist influx and people can gain knowledge about other cultures and traditional dishes.

Response: In recent times, shoppers in many countries have the option to buy food from all over the world at supermarkets. In my view, while it can sometimes negatively affect local producers and the quality of imported food, overall, the positives are more significant. On the one hand, the availability of global food products in supermarkets can present two major challenges. One problem is that it can reduce the sales of locally produced food and lead to joblessness and potential bankruptcy for local producers and farmers as they usually struggle to compete with famous international brands. Many customers would probably prefer more widely-known brands, viewing them as more reliable, which can greatly reduce the demand for local products. Importing food from other countries can also affect both its freshness and quality. Because of the long distances required for transportation, imported food is usually not as fresh as locally produced options and may include preservatives or additives, which could be harmful to health. Despite these drawbacks, the benefits of having access to a diverse range of global food products cannot be ignored. Firstly, it leads to increased consumer choices and allows them to buy a product based on their preferences, dietary needs, or cultural background. For instance, Iranian immigrants in Europe and North America can purchase ingredients of Iranian cuisines, such as saffron, from supermarkets, and enjoy cooking traditional local food. In addition, importing food products from various countries helps international trade and the economy. The exchange of food between countries can create new occupational opportunities, and strengthen their economic relationship. This can also encourage local farmers to stay in the competition and offer higher quality products and more varied options. In conclusion, while the accessibility of global food products in supermarkets around the world is not without drawbacks, I believe we gain more than we lose from this development.

Response: In modern times, people in many countries can access to foods from different parts of the world, thanks to the globalization that has brought this opportunity. While it poses negative impacts on our planet, I believe that it has its positive aspects as well. Firstly, migrants can purchase their favorite products from different countries. In this globalized world, many people have migrated to experience more. With availability of their national foods and products they can sooth their home-sickness, which allows them to be more productive. For instance, Iranian national cuisine comprises various ingredients that can hardly be found in other places. As a result of this phenomenon, Iranian can still cook their cherished meals even in other countries. Secondly, individuals can experience other national dishes from all around the world. For example, nowadays people from European countries can sample foods from Asia or Affrica and broaden their knowledge about other ethnicities. Therefore, people can strike up a conversation with their foreign friend over their foods, which can act as a powerful medium to foster friendships. However, transporting products around the globe can cause greenhouse gases’ levels to rise, which eventually may result in climate change and environmental issues. Although this development may have drawbacks, in my opinion its advantages outweigh its disadvantages. In conclusion, people from many countries can now purchase goods from other countries. While some might argue that this can undesirable consequences, I contend that this trend can foster unity and understanding for people. By taking other measures like promoting electrical vehicles or planting more trees, the problems of this globalized phenomenon may be mitigated.