The essay addresses the prompt by discussing both the positive and negative aspects of having access to globally produced food in supermarkets. However, the essay leans more towards the negative aspects, which aligns with the writer's stance. The response could be improved by explicitly stating the writer's position in the introduction and conclusion, making it clearer to the reader.
The essay is generally well-organized, with clear paragraphs that separate different ideas. The use of linking words such as "on the one hand" and "on the other hand" helps in contrasting the positive and negative aspects. However, the transition between ideas could be smoother. For instance, the conclusion could better summarize the main points discussed in the body paragraphs to reinforce the writer's stance.
The vocabulary used in the essay is appropriate and varied. Terms like "ubiquitous," "paramount importance," and "sedentary lifestyle" demonstrate a good range of vocabulary. However, there are some awkward phrases, such as "processed portions" and "produced food," which could be replaced with more precise terms like "processed foods" or "pre-packaged foods."
The essay demonstrates a good command of grammar, with a variety of sentence structures. However, there are some grammatical inaccuracies that need attention. For example, "processed food which can be sold in supermarkets bring many health issues" should be "processed foods that can be sold in supermarkets bring many health issues." Additionally, "produced food mainly consist extra fat" should be "produced foods mainly consist of extra fat."
By addressing these areas, the essay can be more coherent, precise, and aligned with the IELTS writing criteria.