IELTS Writing Samples

Response: In the present climate, environmental problems have sparked an immense amount of heated debate. There exist two perspectives regarding those challenges. While one viewpoint claims that extinction of certain species of flora and fauna is the most important problem, the other argues there are more notable challenges. The proponents of preservation of animals and plants may provide several justifications. Firstly, it has been scientifically proven that the survival of all creatures are dependent on each other, known as life cycle. As axiomatic as it may sound, humans are involved in this cycle, so we might be in danger if particular species become extinct. By way of illustration, cockroaches and mosquitoes are hunted by lizzards. if we have loss of lizzards, the population of cockroaches will be on the increase. This, in turn, can have several adverse consequences. For example, cockroaches may eat seeds of farming products and humans confront lack of certain produce. On the other hand, a group of people opine there are a few more noticeable environmental problems. Global warming has become a significant setback more specifically in recent years. Today, more and more factories and power plants are established, emitting carbon dioxide and other hazardous gases, such as greenhouse gases into the air. These eventually lead to the depletion of ozone layer, which is a protective layer against the UV of the sun. As a result, this dangerous radiation might reach the surface of the earth, threatening the health of billions of individuals. Skin cancer is one of the risks of the UV radiation, according to Dr. Johnes from the University of California. What can be concluded from the above is that I believe there sure exist more noticeable environmental problems than extinction of certain species of creatures, including global warming, which can result in severe consequences in terms of health.

Response: These days there is a contentious discussion on the subject of preserving endangered species. While the first group argues that the extinction of any flora and fauna has the huge devastating impact on our planet, the others argue that there are more significant environmental issues that should be considered as our priority. In this essay, I intend to discuss both viewpoints, and in my perspective, the former group’s mindset is more acceptable. On the one hand, the latter group justify the idea that extinction of specific species is not the biggest environmental concern in our modern world. They convey that, pollution resulted from urbanisation is considered as the principal environmental complication. Nowadays by developing industrialization, humans are putting a major strain on the nature. Many repercussions such as acid rain, global warming, greenhouse gasses are driven from human activities which are influencing the nature negatively which are more considerably have a negative consequences on Earth. Yet, the other group, including myself, believes that the disappearance of plants and animals is the most concerning problem which should be our priority because of two main reasons. At the heart of the matter is the imbalance of the ecosystem obtained from extinction. When a particular species is removed from the nature, it makes some alternation to the food chain. As it is considered the prey of other species and other animals in that habitat, rely on them for their survival, this disappearance put the other creatures at risk. More importantly, it has an impact on human’s life directly or indirectly. Humans consume many of these species as a source of their food, therefore, when one of them is become extinct, our survival as a part of this chain is on threat. In conclusion, environmental issues nowadays are numerous and while some people say that the other environmental problems like global warming is so considerable, I contend that the matter of extinction is the most environmental concern.

Response: In today’s world, environmental issues have become a significant debate among citizens. There are two conflicting views, while some individuals opine that the main problem is related to the extinction of particular flora and fauna, others including myself hold the view that other issues such as deforestation and air pollution are more detrimental. Supporters of particular plants and animals believe that the loss of every species can seriously impact the entire food chain. For example, the extinction of bees due to destroying their habitat and pesticides that humans use, have a direct connection to pollination. Moreover, it is argued that biodiversity plays a crucial role in life-saving medicine such as cancer and antibiotics, as a result, if animals and plants are extinct, humans may not be able to conduct further research. Regarding the second perspective, they posit that the ecosystem suffers from several problems including deforestation, air pollution, and climate change. Deforestation is the main issue as trees can absorb carbon dioxide. What makes an approach positive is the fact that reduces air pollution and makes fresh air for humans. Research reveals that millions of trees are cut down in order to create either paper or construction buildings. This course of action has a considerable effect not only on the extinction of biodiversity but also on climate change. It seems logical to accept that whereas losing some flora and fauna can be serious it is closely linked to other environmental challenges.it is vital to consider to root of problems and try to tackle them. Addressing main issues such as deforestation and air pollution should be our top priority, solving these issues will prevent specious extinction. In conclusion, however, biodiversity has an essential role in the ecosystem and overall human lives, but other environmental problems are more important. If individuals focus on tackling these issues, they can prevent endangered species.

Response: It is argued by people that among environmental issues, loss of certain animals and plants is of paramount importance. While others believe there are more considerable matters compared to the previous category. Nowadays, there are some particular species suffering from environmentally harmful practices. For instance, water contamination by factories poisons a vast majority of fisheries and other aquatic animals. Or some certain types of plants cannot adapt to the changes brought by climate change or global warming. As a matter of fact, these species can be related to a food-chain, and their absence in the chain might finally affect humans as well. Nevertheless, extinction of species, who were not able to cope with difficulties, is a natural phenomenon from thousands of years ago. Infact, devastation of other features is more significant and decisive for sustaining environment. Two common examples which spring to mind are expansion of hole of Ozone layer and reduction of consumable water. Indeed, the impacts of these issues are indispensable, and there must be immediate actions carried out to inhibit the intensification of circumstances which all the lives depend on. I agree there are vital environmental problems that can put severe impacts on a significant number of livings especially humans. Therefore, coping with them has priority to any other problems, including loss of certain species. In conclusion, each animal or plant has their own value and loss of them can be influential to environmet and other livings. However, there are more considerable isuues which are in connection with a broader papulation of creatures, and solving them comes at the first stage.

Response: One of the important arguments among environmentalism is worring for lossing of particular species of plants and animals this time. Althogh, it is one of the greatest aspects of environmental problems, in my opinion some other issuse are as main as lossing especial especies. From an overall perspective, the growth of number of people, causes the over usage of environmental sourses, hunting and cultivating some kinds of species increased drastically recently. Indeed, environment not to be able to foster again rapidlly. Ultimatelly the balance between consuming and applying is damaged. Additionaly, some unique kind of animals were hunted, it is because collectors pay extra money for them. For instance, Hindian tigger hase been extincted, resulting in hunting for years and enhanced local people incomes. However, it is a popular idea these day, in my opinion over polluted is simultaneously realy dangerious for plants and animals this time. Litter are expanded in the suburbs and forest, smog of factories and cars is emissioned due to burn coal in developing countries. Not only we use the vast amounts of vegetables and meet of animals but also desrtoyed their habitats. Furthermore, People should be much more concern about side-effect of their treats. For example, after rised air pollution in tehran 80 % of local birds are migrated and never returnd . In conclusion, my firm belif is, while the loss of particular species of plants and animals is an important topic this time, overpllution and over consumption is as important as other topics and aslo intense lossing the diverce of species in the world.

Response: It is argued among some people that nowadays, the most important of enviromental problems is the loss of particular species of plants and animals. Others believe that there more important environmental issues. While I accept that the extinction of animals and plants is one the most important problems, I believe that there are more important environmental problems which I will argue them below. On the one hand, it is believed by some people that the loss of particular species of plants and animals would be the most important environmental problem. They believe this, for two main reasons: Firstly, the continuing of humans' lives isn't possible without the existance of many speceis of animals. For instance, the existance of a particular type of insects is essential for agricultural activities. Secondly, by extinction of many types of plants, condition will be highly difficult for producing food products, for almost the production all types of food products depends on plants. for example, the grean-tea production can not be continued without the existence of a special type of plant. On the other hand, there are many types of environmental problems that are more essential than the loss of particular species of plants and animals. I believe that air polution that produced by factories or muchines traffic, is the most important of our environmental issues. air polution causes many types of disease for humans. Many types of heart, breathing, skin and eyes diseases are created beacause of air polution. For instance, the city of tehran is one of the most pulluted city all around the world, therefore most people are bothering from a wide rage of diseases; by contrast, cities without a lot of pullotion have the lowest number of sick people. Water pollution is the other dangerous problem. The pollution of water can easily influence on the health condition of humans. For instance, people who live in villages have less diseases related to stomache like stomachace. In conclusion, I believe that nowadays, we have more important environmental problems than the loss of particular species of plants and animals; however, extiction of plants and animal is highly important.

Response: it is believed that the most crucial environmental problem in today's world is the extinction of important species. others believe there much more important obstacles to tend to. the second group are emphasizing on general treats to the planet. in contrast, the first group believe that preserving each specie is a small gesture with great benefits. although both points of views seem eligible, my opinion align more with seconds view. on the one hand, it is believed that our planet is suffering from major issues that require immediate actions and lives of individual creatures might be unimportant compare to them. human destructive behavior damaged environment noticeably and it will bring us to a point that makes us unable to repair it. for instance, cutting down trees of tropical jungles in a large scale and significant increase in carbon dioxide emissions had resulted in global warming and climate changes. on the other hand, some people think that to preserve nature small steps should be taken and saving a few particular endangered animal or planet is a much easier and more intellectual move. there are some key creatures in any habitat that losing them will hurt its foundation. all species are living in food chains and loss of a low member will disturb others. moreover, some animals and plants are providing a suitable atmosphere to live in by their actions and have domino effects on others' lives. for example, one of them are beavers that by making dams on rivers, slow the water flew and let other animal drink the water much easier and make their nests and homes around the water. in conclusion, necessary measures must be taken in matter of large global problems and it isn't wise to just attend to save pre-extinction species. however, I believe some animals are extremely important and should considered as key members of the planet. therefore, we shouldn't lose focus on them to just look at the big picture.

Response: Many individuals argue that the most urgent environmental issue of our time is the loss of specific animal and plants species. Other believe there are more critical environmental issues, including climate. Personally, I believe protecting particular animal and plant species should be considered more urgent issue. Those who argue that loss of particular species of plants and animals is our main environmental problem believe it can have negative lon-term impact on human. Humans rely heavily on plants and animals for their survival. Human provide our food from natural resources and animals. Each species of animals and plants plays a crucial role in food chain. For instance, bees are essential part of food chain dut to pollination, if they becom extinct, whole ecosystem will be distrupt. Therefore, the extinction of specific animal or plant species can threat human life. Others believe we should focus on more serious environmental problems, including climate change or air and water pollution. These problems already have threatend our life and earth, as they damage environment in irreversibel manner. They lead to rising water levels, damaging ozone layer. They aslo harm human health by making air and soil polluted, which not only decrease the qaulity of like but also cause long-term negative effects on our health. However, we can tackle these issue and simulantely consider loss of particular species of animals or plants. In conclusion, although environmental problems, including climate change and air pollution require immediate actions, we must protect rare animal or plant species to avoid extinction.

Response: Diverse perspectives regarding the most significant environmental problem in the present time are prevalent among individuals. While some argue that the primary environmental issue is the extinction of particular species of animals and plant, Others think that there are more preferable environmental issues. Personally. I believe that the latter view is more substantial. This essay will critically examine both facets of the argument with a detailed explanation. On the one hand, many support the idea of attention to other environmental subjects are more essential, such as global warming and air pollution. This is because rising temperature can change many natural habitats and destroying them due to the changing natural environmental condition. For instance, global warming threaten life of polars bears, which need to cold temperature for surviving, by melting the polar ice caps. Additionally, air pollution by pollution the environment can cause numerous diseases, such as asthma. As a result, warming the temperature and air pollution are the most detrimental for human, plants, and animals. On the other hand, some argue that extinction of particular species of plants and animals can lead to loss of biodiversity and effect on our food chain. When endangered species become extinct, it can reduce the biodiversity, which is very significant for food products we consume. This is because some species are important in our food chain because some specific features, namely, drought resistance and water resistance. For example, scientist use these resistance genes for other species which are more vulnerable specially food crops. In conclusion, despite the potential benefits of protecting particular species of plants and animal, I strongly believe that other serious environmental problems are more significant including global warming and air pollution.

Response: The extent to which discovering environmental issues has been a topic of debate among some. The first viewpoint posits that the main problem is connected to the loss of some kinds of flora and fauna while others including myself hold the view that other environmental problems such as pollution and climate change are more important. Regarding the first view, it is said that biodiversity has a vital impact on ecosystem balance as they have their roles such as pollination, water purification, and nutrient cycling, which are all necessary for human survival. Consequently, the extinction of keystone species can trigger detrimental effects, disrupting the entire ecosystem, and leading to irreversible damage. If we cannot manage these serious problems, we will face the eradication of many species like dinosaurs. Shifting to the second school of argument, they believe that in the modern area, a majority of causes have negative effects on the environment. As a case of this point, the form of human lives has changed over time as a result they produce more pollution due to their activities in manufacturing or using private cars. Moreover, research demonstrates every year humans cut down millions of trees in favor of producing paper or toilet paper that they use every day therefore, this course of action will impact to loss of some species. On the other side of the spectrum, environmental problems are more widespread compared to the extinction of particular species of plants and animals. Despite the first view of argument, they are of the opinion that in case of the eradication of species is a significant concern, however, larger issues such as pollution, and deforestation are more crucial. In this point of view posits that the root of all these problems are related to humans. Furthermore, every individual with change their way of life not only they will pave the way for reducing problems but also mitigating the extinction of flora and fauna. In conclusion, it is logical to accept that the loss of some animals and plants has become an urgent matter among some, other problems are more important because all of society is responsible for decreasing them in order to protect ecosystems.