IELTS Writing Samples

Response: In some nations, it is highly prevalent that adults encourage their children to work hard in order to become successful in any target. While this approach can be beneficial for children, there are some side effects that should not be ignored. Raising children’s awareness about the significant importance of being determined for achieving any goal fosters their self-confidence enough to challenge perspective problems towards success. This strategy of nurturing children helps them pursuing their aims despite facing different obstacles, making them stronger to tackle with difficulties, and leading to attaining self-confident personality.The more they become self-esteemed, the more it facilitates their progression. For example, they can compete with others without any anxiety or being nervous, enhancing their task performance, because they believe that they have the abilities to overcome any problem. However, this approach may make them highly prone to some mental illness. When they are engaged in real competitive world from their formative years, instead of playing games consistent to their age, they may become extremely exhausted and frustrated from thinking like adults. This may lead to some psychological diseases such as depression and adjustment disorder, which are highly hazardous for their overall well-being. As a consequence of these ailments, they may lose their prospective and prosperity. It can be estimated that the proportion of such illnesses are relatively higher in such cultures compared to other parts of the world. In conclusion, although encouraging children to try hard to gain achievements can be advantageous in some aspects, the drawbacks should be recognized properly to make a balanced treatment for children.

Response: In modern times, deposit and money management are one of the important skills for every one including young people to secure rheir future. Some people argue that people should learn to live in moment and enjoy it with out just thinking about future. While, some other people believe that saving money can give discipline in personal and prefesional lives of young people. I agree to some extants with the latter viewpoint, and in this essay I will support my opinion with examples. From one perspective, it is argued by some that saving money and thinking about future can cause losing now, because if people tend to just thinke about future and save mony for it they can become anxious. As a result, people specialy youngest should learn how to live in the moment. A resent study conducted by Cambridge university shows that when people are futuristic and save money for catastrophic incedents, their brine starts the stress metabolic in humen bodys that can cause several reaction on people's cell specially it can increase risk of cardiovascular disease, as a consequent, it not only can cause anxiousness, but also can incrase risk of several biological diseases. On the flip side, many people holed the view that desposit and mony management are significant effects on future of people, because these skills can give discipline to young people which have undeniable roles in their success. Meanwhile, saving mony for future can help them to deal with unpredictable incident in future. As a result, these skills can increase the probability of their success and gives them a safe future. A tangible example of this is Japan, where the governments have invested on thiching young people about money management and increasing their awerness about the considerable effects of it in their future success, so a growing number of japaneses have remarkebel discipline in their personal and prefesional lives. All things considered, dispet the fact that being futuristic and save money for it can increase peoples stress level, it has a substantial roles on peoples success with improvement of their discibline. Personaly, I agree with the saving money, but if pople can management their strese, which became from futuristic, saving money can have significant benefit for them.

Response: In some countries, the majority of people are becoming interested in understanding about the history of the house they live in. There are several reasons for that I will mention in this essay. To begin with, one reason that people tend to know about the history of the building they are live in is that they can sell it in higher prices and earn money. As the more buildings relate to the past time, the more valuable they might be for people, leading to a rise in selling with high prices. For example, some houses’ architecture is specific due to their history, making them fantastic and valuable, which can lead to improvement in their prices. Furthermore, people want to know more about their ancestors and heritages by the history of the house they live in, because of their curiosity or maybe want to protect it, and maintain for their young generations. Moreover, people can research about the history of the house they live in through their local libraries. In some regions, there are some libraries that maintain old books about the history of that region, allowing people to access the history of the house they live in. People can also attain information through the elderly who have been living there for many years. Old people often can help people understand the exact time when the house started building. In conclusion, I believe that people tend to know about their houses’ history because of enabling to sell it in higher prices, and they may be curious about their heritages and ancestors as they are valuable for them and want to preserve it for their next generations. They can find information about it through their local libraries or asking from old people living there for a long time.

Response: In many countries, rural populations are migrating to cities, leading to a decline in countryside populations. Some people, including me, believe that this trend is beneficial, while others argue that it is detrimental. Urban areas offer more advantages compared to rural regions, including advanced infrastructure such as well-maintained roads, high-quality education, and better healthcare systems. People seeking a higher quality of life prioritize living in urban areas to access these facilities. In contrast, the lack of adequate amenities in rural areas leads to dissatisfaction and lower life expectancy. For instance, the absence of sufficient health centers can cause serious health issues for residents in these regions. Furthermore, a reduced population in rural areas can be more environmentally friendly. With fewer individuals living in the countryside, less pollution might be generated by human activities, such as greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural equipment. This makes these regions more pristine and suitable habitats for wildlife. However, some argue that migration from rural areas to urban centers can result in overpopulation, leading to a shortage of job opportunities and housing. While this is a valid concern, addressing it requires governmental intervention. Authorities should develop comprehensive strategies to construct more skyscrapers to utilize land efficiently and allocate more budgets for diverse industries to create job opportunities for the growing urban population. In conclusion, I believe urbanization is beneficial for both people and the environment. Urban residents enjoy better opportunities and an improved quality of life, while rural areas benefit from a lower population, which helps preserve the environment for wildlife. Although challenges such as urban overcrowding exist, they can be effectively managed through thoughtful planning and government policies

Response: Some people believe that professions, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish. Discuss both views and give your own opinion In today's globalized world, people have the opportunity to live and work in various countries. While some believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should remain in the country where they received their training, others argue that they should have the freedom to work wherever they choose. This essay will discuss both perspectives and present my opinion. Proponents of requiring professionals to stay in their training country argue that this would address shortages in critical sectors like healthcare. For example, in countries like Iran, emigration has led to a lack of doctors, causing significant challenges for public health. Furthermore, these individuals benefit from the educational resources of their home country, often subsidized by taxpayers. Thus, there is a moral obligation to give back to the society that facilitated their education. Universities also have limited capacity, and it may seem unfair if students occupy spaces only to leave upon graduation, depriving others of the same opportunity. While these arguments are valid, enforcing such restrictions may violate individual rights. A better approach could involve requiring graduates to work locally for a few years before seeking opportunities abroad. On the other hand, opponents argue that individuals should have the freedom to decide where they live and work. People are more productive and motivated when working in environments that align with their personal goals and preferences. Forcing someone to remain in a country where they feel dissatisfied may reduce their efficiency, potentially leading to substandard work. For instance, an engineer working in an unfulfilling environment might lack innovation, or a dissatisfied doctor may make critical errors in diagnosis. Additionally, some countries may lack sufficient job opportunities in specific fields. For example, while chemistry may offer lucrative careers in Canada, it might not be as practical in other nations, forcing professionals to seek work elsewhere. In conclusion, while it is essential to address the adverse effects of emigration on certain countries, individuals should not be compelled to stay where they trained. Governments can instead implement temporary work obligations or incentives to balance national interests with personal freedoms, allowing professionals to thrive in environments where they feel most fulfille

Response: In the fast-paced world, it is predicted that transportation vehicle such as cars, buses and truck will become auto pilot without any driver. The consequences of this phenomenoun has sparked a contentious debate regarding the advantages and disadvantages. While there are valid concern about the challenges it presents, such as the reliability, the benefits of the driverless vehicles far outweigh the drawbacks. Firslty, on of the significant advantages of driverless vehicles is the safety. Eliminating the human errors and unexpected breakdowns, the safety of passengers will considerably increased. Many accidents are happened everyday due to the mistakes directly related to the drivers . For instance, it is reported that lacking of drivers sleep has caused the numerous accidents. Moreover, unexpected issues in traditional cars such as running out of oil could caused disasters for passengers. This issue could be fixed by the central alert systems of driverless vehicles. Furthermore, driverless vehicles are greatly faster. By navigeating, Their central GPS system will allow them to find the best path. Furethermore, although drivers are most well-experienced and high-skill in driving, driverless vehicles are more efficient. Their technological system are boast by a predictive platform to collect the real-time traffic congestion data resulting in lowest traveling time. These advantages can approved the benefits of this emerging technology. However, driverless vehicles can faced some possible challages. the reliability of these vehicles are the main.It is seen that technical systems may fail in network system and connection.For instance, If the technical system hub of vehicle crashs, severe accidents will be resulted. In a similar example, losting in the connection of network in this vehicle could caused them to traveling to a wrong destenation. In conclusion,the emerging technologies such as driverless vehicles have the possible potential of providing a safe and fast travel. the benefits of them far outweigh drawbacks. However, their reliablity should be improved to secure the problems that passengers might be faced

Response: There is a segment of society who believes that competing in life routine is positive, while others think that helping each other is more beneficial. I align my self with latter statement. People have always been competing with each other in different areas. There are several factors responsible for why they like competition. Firstly, they compare themselves with their classmates or co-workers, which leads them to try more and fall in the trap of competition. Moreover, they might suffer from mental health issues that may appear as unsatisfiancy. Again, they may feel better if they compete with others and with those battles. But I believe this kind of competition may have many affects on their lives. They may not enjoy their lives until they get what they want, which I think is so cruel for their mental wellbeing. Furthermore, their personal lives is going to be affected after they spent their days in competitions. On the other hand, there are people who argue that cooperating is a better way than competing. If we teach our children to have a company in any task that they supposed to do, consequently they will learn how to help each other and get better results. Recent studies showed that athletes whom are participating in group sports, are better in solving problems and are less likely to suffer from anxiety and depression. Indeed being a part of team results in experiencing empathy, happiness and sadness all together. Conversely, exposing your self in competition for a long period may consequences in anger and frustration. In conclusion, although individuals have always tried to be the best version of themselves, it is better to abandon this behaviour and try to cooperate.

Response: In recent years, some children told about they can got any thing if they tried hard enough. This trend has brought several advantages and drawbacks. This essay will discuss the benefits such as positive rosy and setting goals, as well as it also presents challenges, such as disappointed and insisting on woring goals. One of the primary benefits of some children told about they can got any thing if they tried hard enough is the optimistic and achving goals. Setting goals and optimistic are two options which plays an essential role in everyone's success. For example, by being optimistic in life one can manage tasks effectively, which result in achieving goals. However, some children about they can got any thing if they tried hard enough. One major drawback is frustrated . By being disappointed and failed to achive their goals. For example, they can be depressed in some cases, especially who are emotionally fragile. Furthermore, insisting on woring goals, can result following what they talented, especially for children enormous goals and they can't ability to their goals. For example, these kind of children by being don't achieve for what they were thought and they managed in life they feel failing to achive goal. Overall, while some children told about they can got any thing if they tried hard enough offers several benefits, such as setting goals. It also brings serious drawbacks disappointed. Although the benefits may make children told about they can got any thing if they tried hard enough appealing in certain ways, the disadvantages highlight the need for balanced approach. To fully address these issues, individuals and policymakers alike must carefully weigh both the positives and negatives, ensuring that children told about they can got any thing if they tried hard enough is used in a way that maximizes benefits while minimizing its adverse effects.

Response: No one can deny the paramount importance of education. A debate has emerged about whether students should be focused just on their main subjects rather than studying other subjects. I argue that the positive consequences of learning other subjects beside your main one, particularly in terms of personal development and social impacts, far outweigh the drawbacks, making it a largely beneficial approach. On the one hand, many opponents claim that a number of disadvantages are associated with this strategy. They believe that students cannot understand their core subjects due to the fact that they have to spend a vast amount of time to other lessons. Consequently, they will be faced with many hardships in the future, especially when they want to address a project related to their expertise, owing to lack of enough knowledge that rooted in that they do not dedicate time to core courses. Moreover, a growing body of research indicates that focusing in multiple subjects often comes with unsuitable results. Which is why, scientists have proposed students that learn many subjects at the same time can be a reckless mission. On the other hand, numerous proponents assert this is a though-provoking idea that could lead to many benefits. For example, through studying various lessons students show a better performance in their main subjects. A poignant example can be found in a survey conducted in Japan, which revealed that those students who opt for this approach can achieve better mark in their exams. Furthermore, by learning another subject along with main one students become multidimensional, increasing their employability. Thus, this underscores the long-lasting personal and social advantages of prioritizing learning additional courses beside the core course. In conclusion, concentrating just on core subjects by students is thought by some to be the best strategy, many declare that it can be beneficial that they have knowledge of other subjects. I firmly believe that the multitude of benefits derived from this approach can pave the way for students to have a bright future especially to secure job

Response: Nowadays, various health issues in the public are caused by the high rate of sugar content in manufactured food and drinks. Some argue that the best method to avoid these problems is for governments to increase the prices of these kinds of food and drink. While I agree that manufactured foods and drinks have direct effects on health problems, I believe that there are more alternative measures that governments can take to address this situation. On the one hand, it is true that processed food and drink have fewer nutrients than domestic meals; in fact, these types of foods often contain significant levels of sugar. Therefore, manufactured food and drink play a crucial role in increasing diseases, such as diabetes. They are always part of people’s diets regardless of age and gender, like a child taking packaged cakes every day to school, or adults consuming ready-made drinks. Moreover, obesity and a sedentary lifestyle are other drawbacks. For example, children have an obsession with eating ice creams, chocolates, and sodas; as a result, in adulthood they might face those problems besides the health issues. On the other hand, while others advocate for higher prices of factory-made products to people discourage from purchasing them, in my opinion, there are more productive methods that can be used by governments. Firstly, raising public awareness about the problems through advertisements in talk shows or on social media platforms. Additionally, the government can take an important step through its educational system, which directly has an essential impact on children. Mostly, teachers are the greatest role models for their students. Finally, the health system makes a significant contribution in this matter. For instance, doctors and nurses can educate patients about their well-being, encouraging them to monitor their diets more closely. In conclusion, processed food and drink products have detrimental effects on human health due to their considerable amounts of sugars. Some people consider that individuals will be less attracted to these kinds of products, if governments introduce laws to increase their prices. Although I completely agree with the health issues, such as diabetes and obesity, I disagree with this solution. In my view, governments can tackle this problem through the educational and health systems.