This section presents a professionally wirtten variation of your essay and highlights the differences.
It is widely believed that employees’ weekends should be prolonged. I strongly agree with this notion, on the one condition that there is enough observance of how working hours are spent and how efficient the workforce is.
It is widely believed that employees' weekends should be extended. I strongly agree with this notion, provided that there is adequate monitoring of how working hours are utilized and how efficiently the workforce operates.
On the one hand, based on recent research people’s job efficiency is totally affected by their mental status and as a result, the whole outcome of a typical company or on a larger scale, the country is influenced by an individual’s spirit. Being given a longer time to rest, staff feel a sense of being appreciated and consequently put more effort into doing tasks in a much flourishing way. They don’t resist working longer hours when needed if they are certain that their families receive the required attention and care for them and that their occupation does not disturb their family ties.
On one hand, recent research indicates that employees' job efficiency is significantly influenced by their mental well-being. Consequently, the overall performance of a company, or even a country on a larger scale, is affected by an individual's morale. When employees are granted longer periods of rest, they feel valued and, as a result, are more motivated to perform their tasks effectively. They are more willing to work longer hours when necessary, knowing that their families receive the attention and care they need, and that their jobs do not interfere with their family relationships.
On the other hand, decreasing working hours should not be interpreted as insignificance of the job. It needs to be cleared by the employers that being rewarded for leisure time means higher expectations of them regarding the hours spent by the staff at the office. If needed, the ones meeting the expectations should be given promotions and the other group ought to be punished either financially or by being obliged to spend more time at the workplace to do their assigned duties.
On the other hand, reducing working hours should not be misconstrued as a devaluation of the job. Employers must clarify that being rewarded with leisure time comes with heightened expectations regarding productivity during office hours. Those who meet these expectations should be considered for promotions, while those who do not may face financial penalties or be required to spend additional time at work to fulfill their responsibilities.
In conclusion, it is a fabulous opinion to support working individuals by giving them time to do their favourite activities and have fun with their loved ones; however, strong observing measures need to be taken to have the best possible result.
In conclusion, supporting working individuals by providing them with time to engage in their favorite activities and spend quality time with loved ones is a commendable idea. However, effective monitoring measures must be implemented to ensure optimal outcomes.