Task Achievement:
The essay presents a clear position (disagreeing with the statement) and supports it with relevant arguments. The response addresses the prompt directly, discussing both the financial aspects of online reading and the emotional benefits of printed books. However, some points could be developed further for greater depth. For example, the argument about online reading not being entirely free could be strengthened with more specific examples or data. Additionally, the conclusion effectively summarizes the main points but could be more concise.
Coherence and Cohesion:
The essay is logically structured, with each paragraph focusing on a distinct argument. However, there are minor issues with transitions between ideas. For instance, the shift from discussing costs to the emotional benefits of books could be smoother. Some sentences are overly long or awkwardly phrased, which affects readability (e.g., "online libraries are not going to be completely free, as they aren't now"). Using clearer connectors (e.g., "Furthermore," "On the other hand") would improve flow.
Lexical Resource:
The vocabulary is generally appropriate, but there are some inaccuracies and awkward word choices (e.g., "paper base source" should be "printed sources," "an completely disconnected environment" should be "a completely disconnected environment"). Some phrases could be more precise (e.g., "population who are interested in literature" could be "readers" or "book enthusiasts"). A wider range of synonyms and more natural phrasing would enhance lexical variety.
Grammar and Accuracy:
There are several grammatical errors, including article misuse ("an E-book" should be "an e-book"), subject-verb agreement issues ("online libraries... isn't" should be "aren't"), and incorrect prepositions ("pay authors or their journalists" could be "pay authors and journalists"). Some sentences are fragmented or lack clarity (e.g., "Also, publishers need to pay authors or their journalists therefore people who work in those careers can keep writing"). Proofreading for grammar and sentence structure would significantly improve accuracy.
Suggestions for Improvement:
Overall, the essay presents a coherent argument but would benefit from clearer expression, stronger examples, and improved grammatical accuracy.