Task Achievement:
The essay addresses both views and presents a clear opinion, fulfilling the task requirements. The introduction sets up the discussion well, and the conclusion summarizes the stance effectively. However, some points could be developed further for greater depth. For instance, the argument about accepting reality could include more specific examples or reasoning to strengthen the discussion.
Coherence and Cohesion:
The essay is logically structured, with clear paragraphs for each viewpoint and a balanced conclusion. However, some transitions between ideas could be smoother. For example, the shift from discussing economic struggles in Iran to individual resilience feels abrupt. Using linking phrases like "Despite these challenges, some argue that..." could improve flow. Additionally, the phrase "Our lives are like a roller coaster which is filled of astonishing and dismal moments" contains an error (filled of should be filled with), which slightly disrupts coherence.
Lexical Resource:
The vocabulary is generally appropriate, with some strong word choices (dismal, moribund, initiative). However, there are minor errors ("strive a lot" could be "strive hard" or "make great efforts"). Some phrases are awkward ("economic basket case" is informal for academic writing; "thanks to inflation" is ironic and may confuse). Aim for more precise and formal expressions.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy:
There are several grammatical errors that affect clarity:
The sentence structures are varied but could be more polished. For example, "Hardships can motivate us to progress better and faster" could be refined to "Hardships can serve as motivation for faster and more effective progress."
Overall, the essay presents a balanced discussion with a clear opinion but would benefit from tighter grammar, more precise vocabulary, and smoother connections between ideas.