This section presents a professionally wirtten variation of your essay and highlights the differences.
It is argue that there are two main attitudes toward bad situations: they can be tolerated or we can try and improve the condition. I personaly believe that we have to resist against bad situations and we have to try to improve them as much as possible.
It is argued that there are two main approaches to dealing with difficult situations: accepting them or striving to improve conditions. Personally, I believe we should actively resist unfavorable circumstances and make every effort to enhance them.
On the one hand, I don't agree the idea that it's best to accept bad situations. The acceptance of bad conditions happen in our lives, leads to this reality that, we must tolerate this unpleasant situation like the shortage of money and we must do nothing to improve our lives. Furthermore, if we don't try to tackle our problems, the amount of problems will be more difficult in the near future; therefore, it's better to resolve our issues and prevent from the greatest problems in the future.
On one hand, I disagree with the notion that passively accepting bad situations is optimal. Resigning ourselves to poor conditions, such as financial difficulties, creates a mentality where we tolerate unpleasant realities without attempting to improve our lives. Moreover, if we fail to address our problems, they often escalate and become more challenging to resolve in the future. Therefore, it is preferable to tackle issues proactively to prevent them from worsening.
On the other hand, I believe that the best solution to our problems is try to imporve them. the improvement of our bad situations can be done in some ways. Firstly, if we do not have job satisfaction, it's better to change our job or our employer; therefore, we solve our job unsatisfactory problem as easy as we can. Secondly, it's better to us to improve our bad conditions. For instance, if we are in a shortage of money, it's better to work overtime as much as possible instead of staying at home and sit back on a chair. Finally, in spite of all problems, we should invest on small steps, for it is proved by the scientists that small forward steps can have large influences in our lives in a long period for example one year.
On the other hand, I maintain that the optimal solution is to actively improve our circumstances. This can be achieved through various means. Firstly, if job dissatisfaction arises, seeking alternative employment or discussing concerns with employers can effectively resolve workplace issues. Secondly, we should take initiative to better our situations. For instance, during financial constraints, working overtime proves more productive than remaining passive. Finally, research demonstrates that consistent small steps toward improvement yield significant long-term benefits, even within a year.
In conclusion, I believe that the best way to dominate our problems is nothing except try and improve them. It would be well if we learnt that problems easily could be solved by chronic try.
In conclusion, I firmly believe the most effective approach to overcoming challenges lies in persistent efforts to improve conditions. We should recognize that sustained, determined action can successfully resolve most difficulties we encounter.