The essay addresses the prompt by discussing both views on whether university students should learn additional subjects alongside their main subjects. The writer provides a clear opinion, supporting the idea of learning other subjects. However, the essay could benefit from a more explicit thesis statement in the introduction to clearly outline the writer's stance and the structure of the essay.
The essay is generally well-organized, with clear paragraphs dedicated to each viewpoint. The use of rhetorical questions and examples helps to engage the reader and illustrate points. However, the transition between ideas could be smoother. For instance, the essay could benefit from more cohesive devices to link the paragraphs and ideas, such as "Furthermore," "In contrast," or "Additionally."
The vocabulary used in the essay is appropriate and varied. Words like "demographics," "unbeneficial," and "one-dimensional" demonstrate a good range of vocabulary. However, there are some spelling errors, such as "cirriculum" (should be "curriculum"), "innterested" (should be "interested"), and "compeletely" (should be "completely"). Attention to spelling and word choice would enhance the lexical resource.
The essay demonstrates a good range of grammatical structures, including complex sentences and conditionals. However, there are some grammatical errors that need attention, such as "not letting pupils focusing" (should be "not allowing pupils to focus") and "acknowledging yourself with them" (should be "familiarizing oneself with them"). Correcting these errors would improve the grammatical accuracy of the essay.
Overall, the essay presents a balanced discussion with a clear opinion, but it could be improved with better cohesion, accuracy, and more detailed examples.