Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Response:
Choosing a career path and workplace is one of the hardest decisions to make in adulthood. While some claim that people should work in the same country as they were trained in, others believe people have the right to freely pick up the country they want to work for. I subscribe to the latter viewpoint.
There are some people who believe that individuals have obligations regarding the country they were trained in. They must serve the same country and provide services for the citizens. Admittedly, the country trained the professionals to benefit from their skills in various fields to enhance the country’s living conditions; however, humans are free to decide where they would like to spend the rest of their lives, and they can share their experience with the region they graduated from. A dermatologist, for instance, might find her success in working for a developed country instead of the developing one. Thus, by immigrating, she can build a brighter future for herself, while keeping in touch with her university, and sharing her new achievements and knowledge with it.
There is a group, on the other hand, who rightly argues that there should not be any limiting factors for adults, selecting their workplace. Since people do not choose where they were born, they must be given the opportunity to decide whether they want to stay or leave their country. Moreover, there might be positions that have more benefits, such as higher income, better insurance, so having the right to choose is crucial for everyone. An earthquake engineer might be given a promising job and future in another country, which he looks forward to accepting. By going abroad he is likely to develop and grow impressively.
To sum up, I believe that although people have responsibilities toward the country they studied in, without doubt it is not necessarily an obstacle for them in order to follow their dreams in other places.
Marking your essay. This might take a few minutes.
Click on red question marks (?) to see an explanation for each change. Some changes are only suggestions and don't mean the original is necessarily wrong.
This section presents vocabulary suggestions. Highlighted words are either too simple or are repeated more than 3 times . Please note that some suggested alternatives might require changes to other parts of the sentence.
This section presents a professionally wirtten variation of your essay and highlights the differences.
Choosing a career path and workplace is one of the hardest decisions to make in adulthood. While some claim that people should work in the same country as they were trained in, others believe people have the right to freely pick up the country they want to work for. I subscribe to the latter viewpoint.
There are some people who believe that individuals have obligations regarding the country they were trained in. They must serve the same country and provide services for the citizens. Admittedly, the country trained the professionals to benefit from their skills in various fields to enhance the country’s living conditions; however, humans are free to decide where they would like to spend the rest of their lives, and they can share their experience with the region they graduated from. A dermatologist, for instance, might find her success in working for a developed country instead of the developing one. Thus, by immigrating, she can build a brighter future for herself, while keeping in touch with her university, and sharing her new achievements and knowledge with it.
There is a group, on the other hand, who rightly argues that there should not be any limiting factors for adults, selecting their workplace. Since people do not choose where they were born, they must be given the opportunity to decide whether they want to stay or leave their country. Moreover, there might be positions that have more benefits, such as higher income, better insurance, so having the right to choose is crucial for everyone. An earthquake engineer might be given a promising job and future in another country, which he looks forward to accepting. By going abroad he is likely to develop and grow impressively.
To sum up, I believe that although people have responsibilities toward the country they studied in, without doubt it is not necessarily an obstacle for them in order to follow their dreams in other places.