Task Achievement:
The essay addresses both views presented in the prompt and provides a clear opinion. However, the introduction could be more precise in outlining the two perspectives before stating the writer’s stance. The body paragraphs present arguments for both sides effectively, but some points could be developed further with more specific examples or deeper analysis. The conclusion restates the opinion clearly but could be slightly more nuanced.
Coherence and Cohesion:
The essay is logically structured, with clear paragraphing and a good flow of ideas. However, some transitions between sentences could be smoother. For example, phrases like "Additionally" and "Moreover" help, but a few sentences feel abrupt. The argument would benefit from more cohesive devices to link ideas more naturally.
Lexical Resource:
The vocabulary is generally appropriate, with words like "indispensable," "intrusive," and "manipulate" showing a good range. However, there is some repetition (e.g., "advertisements" is used frequently), and a few phrases could be more precise (e.g., "extremely beneficial to convincing consumers" could be reworded for clarity). More varied synonyms and idiomatic expressions would enhance lexical richness.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy:
The grammar is mostly accurate, but there are minor errors and awkward constructions. For example:
Some sentences could be more complex to demonstrate a wider range of structures.
Suggestions for Improvement:
Overall, the essay is well-structured and presents a balanced discussion, but refining clarity, cohesion, and grammatical precision would strengthen it further.