IELTS Writing Samples

Response: It is sometimes argued that in the far future newspapers and books will disappear. Due to advancements in technology, news and books will be published online and with no need for payment, so they will be more accessible to people. While I agree that books and newspapers would be significantly affected in the future, I believe that there are individuals who will continue to buy paper books or newspapers, and even pay for them. On the one hand, the effects of technological developments are undeniable, particularly on books and newspapers. First of all, with a considerable range of platforms in the world, there is competition between local and national press to attract their customers, so the newest news will be published quickly and will be available and free on many platforms, even on social media, like Instagram. In addition, as more people become aware of the detrimental effect of printing paper, which causes deforestation, they are less willing to buy these and prefer more e-books or read news online. Therefore, these traditional ways will lose their attraction. On the other hand, despite the above arguments, I believe that some people are going to use paper-based news or books in the future. By increasing the speed of publishing news, there are potential disadvantages. Firstly, the quality of news will decrease; and secondly, the yellow press might publish false news to increase their income. As a result, individuals will buy news to ensure that the publisher does not make any mistakes for its profit. Moreover, there are a number of people who struggle with the physical conditions, medical problems or not being familiar with technology, so they will buy paper books or news. For example, the older generation or disabled people who are not being able to go out will have to buy books, or people who have eye problems would continue to use traditional methods. In conclusion, in the wake of technology, paper books and newspaper may be forgotten, because in the future everything will be free and available. Although I agree that technology has a vital impact on books and newspapers, in my opinion in the future some people, such as the elderly, will still buy news or prefer to read paper books.

Response: It is sometimes argued that in the far-future newspapers and books would be disappeared. Due to the advancements in technology, news and books will be published online and even no need for payment, so they will be more accessible for people. While I agree that books and newspapers would be affected significant in the future, however I believe that there are individuals who will continue to buy paper books or newspapers, and even pay for them. On the one hand, the effects of the developments of technology are undeniable, particularly on books and newspapers. First of all, by having a considerable range of platforms in the world, there is a competition between local and national press to attract their customers, so the newest news will be published fast and will be available and free on so many platforms, even on the social media, like Instagram. In addition, as more people be aware about a detrimental effect of printing paper which cause deforestation, they are not more willing to buy these and prefer more e-books or read news online. Therefore, these traditional ways will lose their attraction. On the other hand, despite of above arguments, I believe that people are going to use paper-based news or books in future. By increasing the speed of publishing news, there are potential disadvantages. Firstly, the quality of news will be decrease; and secondly, the yellow press might publish false news to increase their outcome. As result, individuals will buy news to make sure that the publisher do not any mistakes for its profit. Moreover, there are a number of people that struggle with the physical condition, medical problems or not being familiar with technology, so they will buy paper books or news. For example, the older generation or disable people who are not being able to go out will have to buy books, or people who having eyes problem would continue to use the traditional methods. In conclusion, In the wake of technology, paper books and newspaper maybe be forgotten, because in the future everything will be free and available. Although I agree that technology has a vital impact on books and newspaper, in my opinion in the future some people, such as the elderly, still buy news or prefer to read paper book.

Response: There are opposing views on whether competition in various environments, including school and work is beneficial. Many argue that it can help us, while others believe cooperating can be more effective. This essay will examine both perspectives and explain why I agree with the former viewpoint. To begin with, a number of individuals hold the belief that cooprationg in better than competition, as it does not put coworkers and pupils against each other. They think rivalry can result not only in hostility but also in the separation of friends in severe cases, while collaborating builds bonds and reinforces team spirit in people. Furthermore, when people work in a team and try to assist each other, more ideas will be created. For example, in many elite companies, in order to address an issue, colleagues tend to brainstorm, as they believe it is the best approach to problem-solving. However, a vast majority of people believe competition in certain areas is essential. First and foremost, being competitive is a part of an individual's nature, and humans inherently tend to be the best in all competitions. If there had not been competition between actors at the Oscar ceremony, no one would have bothered themselves and done their best to win an award. Thereforem, competitive spirit plays a significant role in the progress and enthusiasm of people to develop themselves. In conclusion, although teaming up with others is a good approach as it prevents enmity, I think having competition in different fields is vital, as it helps us to try to get better and achieve resounding accomplishments.

Response: Nowadays, many individuals living in villages are migrating to large towns, resulting in a decline in the population of rural areas. This phenomenon can offer certain advantages to those who move, but it often leads to significant consequences for society as a whole. On one hand, young people who leave their small towns for larger cities find a wealth of opportunities. They have access to a diverse range of activities, including modern clubs, leisure facilities, and various career options. Consequently, by relocating to urban areas, they are likely to experience a more fulfilling life. As they secure employment more easily and earn higher incomes, they can spend their earnings on things that interest them. On the other hand, if an increasing number of people continue to leave rural regions, there will be a shortage of individuals to fulfill essential responsibilities. Professions such as agriculture, farming, and animal husbandry may face extinction if there are not enough people to carry out these vital tasks. The most critical consequence of this trend would be food shortages. If there is insufficient food for the population, it becomes irrelevant where people live or what resources are available to them; everyone will suffer equally. Therefore, it is not a wise decision to deplete small towns of their populations. In conclusion, while the prospect of finding better job opportunities and earning higher salaries is appealing to many, it does not justify the severe repercussions that can arise for society as a whole. Thus, the disadvantages of increased migration from villages to metropolises outweigh the benefits.

Response: Music has been a great representative of cultures for decades. It is argued that music can bring a sense of togetherness to people of different ages and cultures. In my opinion, music couldn’t be only words but also a universal sentiment. Music transmits a wide range of feelings such as sadness, love, grief, and loneliness. As a matter of fact, some people may not understand the exact meaning of the lyrics but can feel empathy with the singer. For example, Taylor Swift is a popular singer who holds universal tours annually for people who may barely know the English language, nonetheless thousands of people attend her tours and enjoy the performance. What's more, some audience members in an interview admitted they didn't know English but could feel the songs. As a result, people of different languages come together to hear the songs of a singer whom they don't know her language. So, I believe that music conveys meaning through words, but some people get the meaning through sentiment. Music mostly doesn’t involve age or location. People have access to a variety of songs from the cutting-edge internet. They can download high-stream music and be connected to worldwide trends. Instagram not only introduces a person but also introduces trendy music to the world. As a result, people from any country aged 60 can hear a song by Taylor Swift in a post on Instagram and consequently decide to attend her tour for the next. However, individuals' tastes in music may be far different, and when they are not interested in a song, they will never be inclined to download it. To conclude, although p may have various tastes in music, I agree that music can result in togetherness that unites people of different languages, cultures, ages, and locations.

Response: In today 's world, the importance of science has sparked cosiderable debate among various groups. Personally, I strongly agree with this statement because science can impact on most part of the part our lives and contribute to other parts. There are several reasons why might argue that science offer significant benefits. First and foremost, science not only affects personal life, but also helps social life. Increasing skills and knowledge can provide great opportunities in socities that lead to recognize our social level. For example, The specialty individuals who live wherever in the world, able to get job such as work in academic position or in fame copmanies and use their science in it. Furthermore, attempt to progress in science can foster your character and make confident that can helps to encourage others to pursue higher education to enhance their lives. On the negative site, some might argue that improving lives is not the most importance of science. Seldom do governments consider the aim of science as a curical part of life, With this in mind, lack of addressing the educational systems in schools and universities can resulted in majority of people don't consider the importance of science. Should government enforce some regulations, they would promote the role of science in improving lives. However, despite these concerns, I belive that science is vital way to improve our lives. In conclusion, while both above perspective have their merits, I compeletly agree improving in lives needs to science and neglecting the aim of science can lead to not improving.

Response: It is true that in some specific areas and religions having a house is more preferred than renting one. While there are various reasons for this trend, such as showing the financial condition of families, I believe that this is a negative situation with some detrimental effects, and individuals should live in a place that feels like a home regardless of owning it or not. There are several reasons why some individuals and households prioritize buying a house for themselves. First of all, children have a strong feeling of ownership of objects or devices, like having their favorite toys and not sharing them, and this feeling is remains in humans even in their adulthoods; therefore, owning a house is a crucial matter for people. Secondly, in some countries, owning a house is a sign of being wealthy, so people are more willing to buy instead of renting to boast about their financial status, and even this situation encourages individuals to have more than one. Finally, in some religions, any changes in decoration, such as the color of walls, are illegal, hence the renters prefer to own a place where they can make any change necessary. As a result, these mentioned reasons have an essential impact on this case. In my opinion, the benefits of owning a place are vital, such as saving a huge amount of money by not paying monthly rent; however, the drawbacks outweigh the advantages. The most important one is when people do not have enough money to own a place; in this situation, individuals feel great pressure on themselves, and this would cause several damages, like depression, anxiety and feeling disappointed, and even the relationships of couples would be affected. For example, in many developing countries owning a place is important, so young couples who cannot afford to buy houses face challenges in their relationship, which sometimes drives them to divorce. Due to these causes, I believe this trend is unproductive, and humanity should prioritize their happiness; indeed, they are better to live in a place that feels like a home to avoid any problems. In conclusion, in some particular areas owning a house is more popular than renting. While the intense feeling of ownership and other factors make a significant contribution to this, in my view, this situation is negative with harmful influences on individuals well-being and their relationships.

Response: It is true that in some specific areas and religions having a house is more preferred rather than renting one. While there are various reasons for this trend, such as showing the financial condition of families, I believe that this is a negative situation by having some detrimental effects, and individual should live in a place that feel like a home regardless of owing it or not. There are several reasons why some individuals and households prioritize buy a house for themselves. First of all, children have a strong feeling of ownership of objects or devices, like having their favorite toys and not sharing them, and this feeling is still in humans even in their adulthoods, therefore owing a house is a crucial matter for people. Secondly, in some countries, owning a house is sign of being wealthy, so people are more willing to buy instead of renting to boast about their financial status, and even this situation encourage individuals to have more than one. Finally, in some religions, any changes in decoration, such as the color of walls, are illegal, hence the rentals prefer to own a place that they can make any change necessary. As a result, these mentioned reasons have essential impact on this case. In my opinion, the benefits of owning a place are vital, such as saving a huge amount of money by not paying monthly rent; however, the drawbacks outweigh advantages. The most important one is when people not having enough money to own a place; in this situation, individuals feel a great pressure on themselves and this would cause several damages, like depression, anxiety and feeling disappointing, and even the relationship of couples would be affected. For example, in many developing countries owning a place is important, so young couples who cannot afford to buy houses, face challenges in their relationship which sometimes drive them to divorce. Due to these causes, I believe this trend is unproductive, and the humanity should prioritize their happiness, indeed they better to live a place that feel like a home to avoid any problems. In conclusion, in some particular areas owning a house is more popular than renting. While the intense feeling of ownership and other factors make a significant contribution to this; in my view, this situation is negative by having harmful influences on individual’s well-being and their relationships.

Response: These days, globalization plays a crucial role in people's lives in terms of purchasing different products in their town. It is thought by some that in the contemporary era, in many countries, people can buy a wide variety of foods imported from other counties by going to the nearest shops. I my opinion, this has positive impacts on people to live with a higher standard and provide them with numerous ethnic and exotic foods from all parts of world. A good reason to consider buying international foods from supermarkets as a positive development is that it can give many individuals freedom and accessibility to buy different products without travelling to other nations. For instance, without globalization, if some individuals want to eat sushi, they may travel to japan to try it, which may cost them a fortune. Hence, they simply can go to a supermarket and buy different kinds of sushi because today every parts of world can sell this food. As result, This is an ingenious idea that allow people to experience various foods any where and any time. Another point to consider is that many manufacturers want to introduce new products worldwide to raise people's awareness about their goods and increase annual selling rate. This way, they export their products to other countries, so people from others regions find these items more quickly in their cities. For example, Kalleh is a big company in Iran, that export various foods overseas, and people all around the world have access to buy kalleh products. Therefore, it would be more beneficial for both manufacturers and citizens. In conclusion, providing individuals with many foods in every shops can be the most popular topic these days. Not only can it lead to accessing many ingredients produced by other countries in each nations, but it also can help people to try international foods without travelling to other regions. Therefore, founders of companies and citizens find it a good development.

Response: It is widely held view that university students ought to put their time and effort on their own studies. However , some may opine that it is a good idea for scholars to learn other subjects as well as their own major. Neverthless, I find the former notion more viable to achieve, owing to time limitations during university years. Some people are of the opinion that acquiring other subjects other than their own descipline is beneficial. It is irrefutable that studying various subjects contributes to broadening one's perspective and boosting creativity, which can be advantageous futher in their life. A striking example of that can be Steve jobs. He used his calligraphy skills that he had learned during his teenage years in designing fonts for his software while working in Apple company many years after acquiring them.Hence, without that skill, he might have not been creative. Furthermore, It is additional studies that hinder individuals to obtain one-sided or biased viewpionts by giving them access to a more creative mindset throughout their lives. Although acquiring additional skills might have some merits, many argue that students have time constrains for studying resources other than their main curriculum. For instance, medical students have to pass an extensive range of lessons before graduation, which are all crucial to acquire the expertise and dexterity for becoming a medical practitioner. It is often recommended to not only focus fully on one's own studies to achieve success during university but also try avoiding any distractions by participating in any extracurricular activities. University students are limited in time and energy, therefore they have to strive to exploit them and also concentrate solely on their own studies In the final analysis, acquiring additional skills by studying different subjects might be benficial by giving an individual a multifacated perspective, it may not be applicable to everybody due to time limitations. I find myself among the supporters of latter view, since it is more feasible.