Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Response:
Some belive professionals should work in countries where they were educated. Others argue that they should have freedom to choose countries where they want to work .personally , I believe individuals should have freedom when they want to make decisions about the country that they want to work due to reasons I will mention in essay
Individuals who argue that professionals should be needed to work in their countries believe professionals should compensate the fundings that are spent on their education. To educate professional, governments should dedicate a significant a lot of public budgets to their education. For example, engineers who master in their major are educated by public buget graduates can compensate this funding by make a positive contribution to economic growth and technological advancements. When educated individuals immigrate to other countries, government may face employees shortage, which not only slow economic growth but also reduce the quality of life for residence.
Other argue that individuals should have freedom to choose where they want to live. Limiting human’s freedom is not only unethical but also can cause hostile and conflicts in society. Professional often immigrant to secure better employment opportunities and improve their quality of their life, which may not be achievable in their countries. By limiting their freedom they not only cannot be productive for countries but may also seek unauthentic ways to leave their countries, which have long-term negative effects for both countries and people. Government should provide good facilities and amenities that can encourage them to stay in their countries instead of limiting their freedom
In conclusion, although immigrating professional can have lone-term negative consequence for society and government, the limitation of human presents more challenge. Therefore government should enforce regulation that incentivize professional to stay in their countries.
Marking your essay. This might take a few minutes.
Click on red question marks (?) to see an explanation for each change. Some changes are only suggestions and don't mean the original is necessarily wrong.
This section presents vocabulary suggestions. Highlighted words are either too simple or are repeated more than 3 times . Please note that some suggested alternatives might require changes to other parts of the sentence.
This section presents a professionally wirtten variation of your essay and highlights the differences.
Some belive professionals should work in countries where they were educated. Others argue that they should have freedom to choose countries where they want to work .personally , I believe individuals should have freedom when they want to make decisions about the country that they want to work due to reasons I will mention in essay
Individuals who argue that professionals should be needed to work in their countries believe professionals should compensate the fundings that are spent on their education. To educate professional, governments should dedicate a significant a lot of public budgets to their education. For example, engineers who master in their major are educated by public buget graduates can compensate this funding by make a positive contribution to economic growth and technological advancements. When educated individuals immigrate to other countries, government may face employees shortage, which not only slow economic growth but also reduce the quality of life for residence.
Other argue that individuals should have freedom to choose where they want to live. Limiting human’s freedom is not only unethical but also can cause hostile and conflicts in society. Professional often immigrant to secure better employment opportunities and improve their quality of their life, which may not be achievable in their countries. By limiting their freedom they not only cannot be productive for countries but may also seek unauthentic ways to leave their countries, which have long-term negative effects for both countries and people. Government should provide good facilities and amenities that can encourage them to stay in their countries instead of limiting their freedom
In conclusion, although immigrating professional can have lone-term negative consequence for society and government, the limitation of human presents more challenge. Therefore government should enforce regulation that incentivize professional to stay in their countries.