This section presents a professionally wirtten variation of your essay and highlights the differences.
A group of people claim that educated persons like doctors and engineers have to work in the country that they studied and became an expert. While some people argue that they have to make it base on their desires, and they have this chance to work in every country that they want. This essay discusses both sides. I agree with the second group, and I believe that people have to work in the country that they want to work.
A group of people claims that educated individuals, such as doctors and engineers, should work in the country where they studied and became experts. Conversely, others argue that they should have the freedom to work in any country of their choice. This essay discusses both perspectives. I align with the latter viewpoint, believing that individuals should have the autonomy to choose where they wish to work.
In every country, government usually assign a huge budget for universities and colleges and provide great facilities for students. As a result, when a person studies in a country, this person is using public money for personal goals. In fact, the money that other people pay as taxes or other excuses, is spending for his/her purpose. As a result, a large group of people believe that it is fair to make people to work in their country and use their knowledge and specialty to make improvement over there.
In many countries, governments allocate substantial budgets to universities and colleges, providing excellent facilities for students. Consequently, when a person studies in a particular country, they are utilizing public funds for their personal goals. In fact, the money contributed by taxpayers is being spent to support their education. As a result, a significant number of people believe it is fair to require individuals to work in their home country, using their knowledge and expertise to contribute to local development.
On the other hand, some members of society claim that it is a personal decision, and people ought to be free to make decision about their career and its place. For instance, young people decide to study abroad, however after their graduation some of them decide to come back to their own country, and serve to their people.
On the other hand, some members of society argue that career choices are personal decisions, and individuals should be free to determine where they want to work. For instance, many young people choose to study abroad; however, after graduation, some decide to return to their home country to serve their communities.
In conclusion, I believe that it is more convenient to let individuals to make decision about the country that they wish to work. In this way, people have more passion to serve to the selected country. Not only does it make them happier, but also it is possible to use their experience in different countries. Due to the progress of technology, it is significantly easy to communicate with experts all around the world and use their abilities and knowledge.
In conclusion, I believe it is more beneficial to allow individuals to make their own decisions regarding the country in which they wish to work. This autonomy fosters greater passion for their chosen country. Not only does this lead to increased job satisfaction, but it also allows them to leverage their experiences from different countries. With the advancement of technology, it has become significantly easier to communicate with experts worldwide and utilize their skills and knowledge effectively.